Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of annexes
- Notes on contributors and editors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Expert roundtables and topics under the ‘second track’ of the Global Consultations
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties and other international instruments
- List of abbreviations
- Part 1 Introduction
- Part 2 Non-refoulement (Article 33 of the 1951 Convention)
- Part 3 Illegal entry (Article 31)
- Part 4 Membership of a particular social group (Article 1A(2))
- Part 5 Gender-related persecution (Article 1A(2))
- Part 6 Internal protection/relocation/flight alternative
- Part 7 Exclusion (Article 1F)
- Part 8 Cessation (Article 1C)
- Part 9 Family unity (Final Act, 1951 UN Conference)
- Part 10 Supervisory responsibility (Article 35)
- Index
Preface
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 August 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of annexes
- Notes on contributors and editors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Expert roundtables and topics under the ‘second track’ of the Global Consultations
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties and other international instruments
- List of abbreviations
- Part 1 Introduction
- Part 2 Non-refoulement (Article 33 of the 1951 Convention)
- Part 3 Illegal entry (Article 31)
- Part 4 Membership of a particular social group (Article 1A(2))
- Part 5 Gender-related persecution (Article 1A(2))
- Part 6 Internal protection/relocation/flight alternative
- Part 7 Exclusion (Article 1F)
- Part 8 Cessation (Article 1C)
- Part 9 Family unity (Final Act, 1951 UN Conference)
- Part 10 Supervisory responsibility (Article 35)
- Index
Summary
The world has changed radically since the establishment of UNHCR and the coming into force of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees some fifty years ago. The modern regime of international refugee protection has been built on these beginnings in the aftermath of the Second World War and is now a complex structure affording vital protection to millions of forcibly displaced people. Within this structure, the Convention and its 1967 Protocol are widely acknowledged as enduring instruments with a ‘central place in the international refugee protection regime’, as States Parties to the Convention and/or Protocol declared in December 2001.
Conclusions have, however, sometimes been drawn which put in question the ongoing relevance of the Convention or which seem to call for its complete overhaul, or even abandonment. Such conclusions are misguided, even dangerous. They contribute to the waning quality of asylum, as State commitment to protection using the available instruments starts to falter. UNHCR does of course recognize that the challenges today are many and various and that there are gaps in the protection framework, even while, at the core, the Convention regime's fundamental principles are as sound and necessary as ever.
The Global Consultations on International Protection have been UNHCR's effort to rise to modern challenges confronting refugee protection, to shore up support for the international framework of protection principles, and to explore the scope for enhancing protection through new approaches, which nevertheless respect the concerns and constraints of States and other actors.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Refugee Protection in International LawUNHCR's Global Consultations on International Protection, pp. xvii - xixPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2003
- 1
- Cited by