Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Foreword
- Introduction
- one Case Con and radical social work in the 1970s: the impatient revolutionaries
- two The best and worst of times: reflections on the impact of radicalism on British social work education in the 1970s
- three Social work and women’s oppression today
- four The jester's joke
- five LGBT oppression, sexualities and radical social work today
- six Radical social work and service users: a crucial connection
- seven Why class (still) matters
- eight International social work or social work internationalism? Radical social work in global perspective
- nine Rediscovering radicalism and humanity in social work
- ten Re-gilding the ghetto: community work and community development in 21st-century Britain
- eleven Resisting the EasyCare model: building a more radical, community-based, anti-authoritarian social work for the future
- Bibliography
- Index
ten - Re-gilding the ghetto: community work and community development in 21st-century Britain
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 September 2022
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Notes on contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Foreword
- Introduction
- one Case Con and radical social work in the 1970s: the impatient revolutionaries
- two The best and worst of times: reflections on the impact of radicalism on British social work education in the 1970s
- three Social work and women’s oppression today
- four The jester's joke
- five LGBT oppression, sexualities and radical social work today
- six Radical social work and service users: a crucial connection
- seven Why class (still) matters
- eight International social work or social work internationalism? Radical social work in global perspective
- nine Rediscovering radicalism and humanity in social work
- ten Re-gilding the ghetto: community work and community development in 21st-century Britain
- eleven Resisting the EasyCare model: building a more radical, community-based, anti-authoritarian social work for the future
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Introduction
The theory and practice of community work is bedevilled by debates around terminology, identity and ideology – just as much as, if not more than, social work. The term ‘community’ (noun), while often dismissed as meaningless, nevertheless has much more substantive content than the term ‘social’ (adjective) as it occurs in ‘social work’. While ‘community’ tends to have a positive evaluative meaning (associated with warmth and caring), it also has a number of descriptive meanings (Plant, 1974) and can be used to describe groups of people that are exclusive, hierarchical, homogeneous and conservative, as well as groups that are inclusive, egalitarian, heterogeneous and challenging. As Purdue et al (2000, p 2) suggest, the contested nature of the concept of ‘community’ allows differing interests to ‘manipulate a term with multiple meanings to their own ends’. In so far as community workers tend to support groups of people with common experiences of disadvantage and oppression to take collective action, they can easily adopt a radical rhetoric linked with a social change agenda. Yet community workers are also very aware of how vulnerable they are to cooption, as governments and service delivery agencies appropriate the radical-sounding discourse of ‘community empowerment’ and ‘social justice’. Community workers have been, and some still are, intensely ambivalent about the mainstreaming of community work as a state-sponsored activity, about moves towards professionalisation and about whether community work should be regarded as a profession, occupation, social movement or a set of skills. To add to the confusion, ‘community work’ as a generic term for a range of practices is being superseded in Britain by the terms ‘community development work’ or ‘community development’ (traditionally regarded as just one of several approaches to community work).
This chapter will first explore the nature of ‘community work’ – outlining an analysis that regards ‘community development’ as one of several approaches to community work. Referring back to Mayo's (1975) chapter, we will consider her conclusion that community development as an intervention has limited radical potential. It is argued that this conclusion is equally valid 35 years later, as the more radical ‘community action’ approaches to community work have been marginalised and community development has become mainstreamed within policies and practices concerned with promoting citizen participation and neighbourhood renewal.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Radical Social Work TodaySocial Work at the Crossroads, pp. 165 - 186Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2011