Book contents
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2010
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Legal Principles in WTO Disputes , pp. 274 - 294Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2008
References
, ‘The WTO Dispute Settlement and General International Law’ in and (eds.), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: The First Ten Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
, ‘A Fresh Look at the Meaning of Denial of Justice under International Law’ (1976) 14 Canadian Yearbook of International Law73Google Scholar
, ‘Tadic, the Anonymous Witness and the Sources of International Procedural Law’ (1998) 19 Michigan Journal of International Law445Google Scholar
, ‘On the (Non-)Effectiveness of the World Trade Organization Special and Differential Treatments in the Dispute Settlement Process’ (2007) 41 Journal of World Trade319Google Scholar
, ‘The Philosophy of Criminal Law’ in and (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 815Google Scholar
, Restatement of the Law Third: The Foreign Relations Law of the United States (St Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers, 1987)Google Scholar
, Restatement of the Law Second, Contracts (St Paul, MN: American Law Institute Publishers, 1981)Google Scholar
and , ‘Proportionality and Balancing in WTO Law: A Comparative Perspective’ (2007) 20 Cambridge Review of International Affairs71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Proportionality: WTO Law: In Comparative Perspective’ (2007) 42 Texas International Law Journal371Google Scholar
, ‘Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2002) 1 World Trade Review123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Setting the Trade Policy Agenda: What Roles for Economists?’ (2005) 39 Journal of World Trade341Google Scholar
and , ‘The Sardines Decision: Fish without Chips?’ in (ed.), Challenges and Prospects for the WTO (London: Cameron May, 2005) 165Google Scholar
, ‘Compliance with the Ozone Treaty: Weak States and the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility’ (2005) 21 American University International Law Review461Google Scholar
, ‘Compulsory Licensing and the Duty of Good Faith in TRIPS’ (2003) 55 Stanford Law Review1529Google Scholar
, ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Separation of Powers in the WTO: How to Avoid Judicial Activism’ (2004) 53 International and Comparative Law Quarterly861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The WTO Enabling Clause and Positive Conditionality in the European Community's GSP Program’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Principle of Proportionality’ (1977–78) 26 American Journal of Comparative Law Supplement415Google Scholar
(ed.), The Routledge Companion to Global Economics (London: Routledge, 2001)
, Modern GATT Law: A Treatise on the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2005)Google Scholar
, and (eds.), The Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia (South Melbourne: Oxford University Press, 2001)
, ‘Risk Regulation in WTO Law: A Procedure-Based Approach to the Precautionary Principle’ (2002) 40 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law323Google Scholar
, The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization: Text, Cases and Materials (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Estoppel Before International Tribunals and Its Relation to Acquiescence’ (1957) 33 British Yearbook of International Law176Google Scholar
, ‘Does Anglo-Canadian Contract Law Need a Doctrine of Good Faith?’ (1984) 9 Canadian Business Law Journal385Google Scholar
, ‘The Incidental Jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice as Compulsory Jurisdiction’ in et al. (eds.), Völkerrecht und Rechtliches Weltbild: Festschrift für Alfred Verdross (Vienna: Springer, 1960)Google Scholar
, ‘Better Rules for a New Millennium: A Warning against Undemocratic Developments in the WTO’ (1999) 2 Journal of International Economic Law547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, International Governance in the WTO: Judicial Boundaries and Political Capitulation (London: Cameron May, 2004)Google Scholar
and , The Court of Justice of the European Communities (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2nd edn, 1983)Google Scholar
, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford International Press, 5th edn, 1998)Google Scholar
, Principles of Public International Law (Oxford: Oxford International Press, 6th edn, 2003)Google Scholar
, and , ‘The Consequences of Agricultural Trade Liberalization for Developing Countries: Distinguishing between Genuine Benefits and False Hopes’ (Discussion Paper No 73, Institute for International Integration Studies, April 2005)
and , The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act: A Commentary (Wellington: LexisNexis New Zealand, 2005)Google Scholar
, Custom, Power, and the Power of Rules: International Relations and Customary International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Principles of International Law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body’ (2001) 50 International and Comparative Law Quarterly248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Role of Proportionality in the Law of International Countermeasures’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The “Constitutionalization” of International Trade Law: Judicial Norm-Generation as the Engine of Constitutional Development in International Trade’ (2001) 12 European Journal of International Law39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization: Legitimacy, Democracy, and Community in the International Trading System (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Contribution of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia to the Ascertainment of General Principles of Law Recognized by the Community of Nations’ in and (eds.), International Law in the Post-Cold War World: Essays in Memory of Li Haopei (London: Routledge, 2001) 43Google Scholar
, ‘Has the WTO Gone Too Far or Not Far Enough? Some Reflections on the Concept of “Policy Space”’ in (ed.), Challenges and Prospects for the WTO (London: Cameron May, 2005) 55Google Scholar
(ed.), Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1997)
and , The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000)Google Scholar
, ‘Should the Teeth Be Pulled? An Analysis of WTO Sanctions’ in and , The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002) 602Google Scholar
, General Principles of Law: As Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (Cambridge: Grotius, 1987)Google Scholar
, ‘Gateways to the Precautionary Principle in WTO Law’ (2007) 19 Journal of Environmental Law155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Risk and Precaution in World Trade Organization Law’ (2006) 40 Journal of World Trade837Google Scholar
‘China Announces Increased Export Tariffs on Textiles’, People's Daily Online, 13 December 2004
, ‘Globalization in Search of Justification: Toward a Theory of Comparative Constitutional Interpretation’ (1999) 74 Indiana Law Journal819Google Scholar
, ‘Implied Terms and Interpretation in Contract Law’ in and (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2000) vol. III, 78.Google Scholar
, , The Future of the WTO: Addressing Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium (Geneva: WTO, 2004)Google Scholar
, and , International Trade Regulation: Law and Policy in the WTO, the European Union and Switzerland – Cases, Materials and Comments (Berne: Staempfli Publishers, 2005)Google Scholar
and , ‘Good Faith and the Protection of Legitimate Expectations in the WTO’ in and (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H Jackson (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000) 47Google Scholar
and , ‘Non-Violation Complaints in WTO/GATT Dispute Settlement: Past, Present and Future’ in (ed.), International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997) 145Google Scholar
, The International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text, and Commentaries (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002)Google Scholar
, The Concept of Custom in International Law (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1971)Google Scholar
, ‘Has the WTO Dispute Settlement System Exceeded Its Authority? A Consideration of Deference Shown by the System to Member Government Decisions and Its Use of Issue-Avoidance Techniques’ in and (eds.), The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the WTO (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003) vol. IV, 43Google Scholar
, ‘Subsidiarity and Proportionality as General Principles of Law’ in and (eds.), General Principles of European Community Law: Reports from a Conference in Malmö, 27–28, August 1999 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2000) 97Google Scholar
, ‘Brazil: Duty of Good Faith in International Services Negotiations’ (2005) 11 International Trade Law & RegulationN15Google Scholar
et al. (eds.), The Macquarie Dictionary (McMahons Point: Macquarie Library, 2nd edn, 1991)Google Scholar
, ‘Proportionality’ in (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. III, 1140Google Scholar
, ‘Due Process and “Good” Regulation Embedded in the GATS – Disciplining Regulatory Behaviour in Services through Article VI of the GATS’ (2007) 10 Journal of International Economic Law13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Proportionality in WTO Law’ (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Loewen Group, Inc v. United States. Modev International Ltd v. United States’ (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Methodology of International Law’ in (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. III, 354Google Scholar
, ‘Deference, but Only when Due: WTO Review of Anti-Dumping Measures’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court” Some Personal Experiences as Member of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’ (2002) 36 Journal of World Trade605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘The Common Law of Contracts: Are Broad Principles Better than Detailed Rules? An Empirical Investigation’ (2005) 11 Texas Wesleyan Law Review399Google Scholar
(ed.), The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe (Oxford: Hart, 1999)
, ‘Duties of Good Faith and Fair Dealing under the UNIDROIT Principles, Relevant International Conventions, and National Laws’ (1995) 3 Tulane Journal of International and Comparative Law47Google Scholar
, ‘Developing States’ in (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. I, 1017Google Scholar
, ‘The Rule of Proportionality and Protocol in Conventional Warfare’ (1982) 98 Military Law Review91Google Scholar
, ‘A Diplomat's Economics: Reciprocity in the Uruguay Round Negotiations’ (2005) 4 World Trade Review27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘The Unbalanced Uruguay Round Outcome: The New Areas in Future WTO Negotiations’ (2002) 25 World Economy321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Some Problems Regarding the Formal Sources of International Law’ [1958] Symbolae Verzijl153Google Scholar
‘The General Principles of International Law Considered from the Standpoint of the Rule of Law’ (1957-II) Recueil des Cours 1
‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice, 1951–4: General Principles and Sources of Law’ (1959) 30 British Yearbook of International Law1Google Scholar
‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1951–4: Treaty Interpretation and Other Treaty Points’ (1957) 33 British Yearbook of International Law203Google Scholar
, ‘Judicial Discretion in International Jurisprudence: Article 38(1)(C) and “General Principles of Law”’ (1994) 5 Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law35Google Scholar
, ‘The Meaning of Proportionality in Sentencing’ (1994) 19 Melbourne University Law Review489Google Scholar
, Fairness in International Law and Institutions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
, The International Responsibility of States for Denial of Justice (London: Longmans, Green & Co, 1938)Google Scholar
, ‘The Uses of “General Principles” in the Development of International Law’ (1963) 57 American Journal of International Law279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Balancing Judicial Economy, State Opportunism, and Due Process Concerns in the WTO’ (2005) 26 Michigan Journal of International Law947Google Scholar
, ‘Due Process in the World Trade Organization: The Need for Procedural Justice in the Dispute Settlement System’ (1999) 14 American University International Law Review1173Google Scholar
, ‘Beyond Special and Differential Treatment’ (2004) 27 Boston College International & Comparative Law Review291Google Scholar
, ‘Proportionality as a Restraint on the Use of Force’ (1999) 20 Australian Yearbook of International Law161Google Scholar
, A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage (New York: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 1995)Google Scholar
Gerstetter, Christiane and Maier, Matthais Leonhard, ‘Legalise It, or Criticise It? Debating the Precautionary Principle in and around the WTO’ (Working Paper, Universität Bremen, 2004)
and , ‘A Theory of Customary International Law’ (1999) 66 University of Chicago Law Review1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Understanding the Resemblance between Modern and Traditional Customary International Law’ (2000) 40 Virginia Journal of International Law639Google Scholar
, ‘Liberty, Equality, Fraternity: The Forgotten Leg of the Trilogy, or Fraternity: The Unspoken Third Pillar of Democracy’ (2000) 45 McGill Law Journal567Google Scholar
, ‘State Responsibility and the “Good Faith” Obligation in International Law’ in and (eds.), Issues of State Responsibility Before International Judicial Institutions (Oxford: Hart, 2004) 75Google Scholar
, ‘Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation’ in and (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 268Google Scholar
, ‘Reciprocity, Proportionality, and the Law of Treaties’ (1994) 34 Virginia Journal of International Law295Google Scholar
and , ‘A Preference for Development: the Law and Economics of GSP’ (2005) 4 World Trade Review41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Comparative Law and the Law of Nations’ (1944) 21 British Yearbook of International Law1Google Scholar
(ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992)
and , ‘Special and Differential Treatment and the Doha “Development” Round’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade395Google Scholar
, ‘Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1935) 29 American Journal of International Law (Supplement)697Google Scholar
, ‘The Law of Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigners’ (1929) 23 American Journal of International Law (Supplement)131Google Scholar
, ‘Power, Rules and Principles – Which Orientation for WTO/GATT Law?’ (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘The Relation of Economic and Non-Economic Principles in International Law’ in (ed.), International Economic Governance and Non-Economic Concerns: New Challenges for the International Legal Order (New York: Springer, 2003)Google Scholar
and , ‘The Principle of Proportionality on its Way into WTO/GATT law’ in , and (eds.), European Integration and International Co-Ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002) 199Google Scholar
, ‘The Keeper of the Flame: Good Faith and Fair Dealing in International Trade’ (1996) 29 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review1059Google Scholar
, ‘Operationalizing the Concept of Policy Space in the WTO: Beyond Special and Differential Treatment’ (2005) 8 Journal of International Economic Law405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Special and Differential Treatment and the Doha Development Agenda: Beyond Tariff Preferences’ (Paper presented at the OECD Global Forum on Trade, Special and Differential Treatment: Thinking Outside the Box, Bridgetown, Barbados, 28–29 June 2005)Google Scholar
and , ‘WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance’ (2000) 23 World Economy527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and , ‘Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries in the WTO: Moving Forward After Cancún’ (2004) World Economy481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Policy Responses to Preference Erosion: From Trade as Aid to Aid for Trade’ (Paper presented at the OECD Global Forum on Trade, Special and Differential Treatment: Thinking Outside the Box, Bridgetown, Barbados, 28–29 June 2005)Google Scholar
(ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995)
, ‘Problems with the Compliance Structure of the WTO Dispute Resolution Process’ in and , The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E Hudec (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002) 636Google Scholar
, ‘Adjudicative Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation in International Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence’ in (ed.), The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA: Toward a Common Law of International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000) 35Google Scholar
and , ‘India's WTO Challenge to Drug Enforcement Conditions in the European Community Generalized System of Preferences: A Little Known Case with Major Repercussions for “Political” Conditionality in US Trade Policy’ (2003) 4 Chicago Journal of International Law385Google Scholar
and , ‘The Jurisprudential Achievement of the WTO Appellate Body: A Preliminary Appreciation’ (Working Paper, University of Michigan, 2004)
and , ‘The Most Dangerous Branch? WTO Appellate Body Jurisprudence on the Nature and Limits of the Judicial Power’ in and (eds.), The Role of the Judge in International Trade Regulation: Experience and Lessons for the WTO (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 2003) vol. I, 11Google Scholar
and , ‘Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization or Global Subsidiarity?’ (2003) 16 Governance73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System (Aldershot, Hampshire, UK: Gower, for the Trade Policy Research Centre, London, 1987)Google Scholar
, ‘Mainstreaming Development in the World Trade Organization’ (2005) 39 Journal of World Trade11Google Scholar
, ‘Varieties of Approach to Treaty Interpretation: With Special Reference to the Draft Convention on the Law of Treaties Before the Vienna Diplomatic Conference’ (1969) 18 International and Comparative Law Quarterly318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘States, Equal Treatment and Non-Discrimination’ in (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. IV, 660Google Scholar
, ‘The Quest for the General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations – A Study’ (1963) 10 UCLA Law Review1041Google Scholar
, ‘What is International Law and How Do We Tell It When We See It?’ (1981) 37 Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht59Google Scholar
and (eds.), Oppenheim's International Law (Harlow, Essex, UK: Longman, 9th edn, 1992)
, ‘Treaty Interpretation: The Authority of Interpretive Communities’ (1991) 12 Michigan Journal of International Law371Google Scholar
and , ‘The Legacy of the Byrd Amendment Controversies: Rethinking the Principle of Good Faith’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade921Google Scholar
, ‘Crime and Punishment: Retaliation under the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement System’ (2005) 39 Journal of World Trade327Google Scholar
, ‘General Characteristics of Rules’ in and (eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics (Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2000) vol. V, 502Google Scholar
, ‘Rules versus Standards: An Economic Analysis’ (1992) 42 Duke Law Journal557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO: Why, When and How?’ in and (eds.), Economic Development & Multilateral Trade Cooperation (Washington DC: Palgrave Macmillan, World Bank, 2006) 147Google Scholar
, ‘Good Faith & the Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)’ (1999) 3 Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law & Arbitration15Google Scholar
, ‘The Twilight of Customary International Law’ (2000) 40 Virginia Journal of International Law449Google Scholar
, Pure Theory of Law (Berkeley: University of California Press, Max Knight trans, 2nd rev. edn, 1967)Google Scholar
, ‘Theses about International Legal Discourse’ (1980) 23 German Yearbook of International Law353Google Scholar
, ‘Special and Differential Treatment: A Mechanism to Promote Development?’ (2005) 6 Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy84Google Scholar
, ‘Custom on a Sliding Scale’ (1987) 81 American Journal of International Law146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Evolving Constitutions of International Organizations by Tetsuo Sato’ (1998) 92 American Journal of International Law153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Constitutional Guarantees, Characterisation and the Concept of Proportionality’ (1997) 21 Melbourne University Law Review1Google Scholar
, ‘The Utility of Bilateral Investment Treaties in the Formulation of Customary International Law’ (1994) 14 Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business327Google Scholar
, ‘Abuse of Rights’ in (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. I, 4Google Scholar
, ‘Reflections on Thomas Franck, Race and Nationalism (1960): “General Principles of Law” and Situated Generality’ (2003) 35 New York University Journal of International Law and Politics437Google Scholar
, ‘Principles as Sources of International Law (with Special Reference to Good Faith)’ (2006) 53 Netherlands International Law Review1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, General Principles: Reflexions on Constructivist Thinking in International Law (1985) XVIII Oikeustiede-Jurisprudentia 121.
, ‘The Law of GATT as a Special Field of International Law: Ignorance, Further Refinement or Self-Contained System of International Law?’ (1994) 25 Netherlands International Law Review227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘De l'interprétation des traités’ (1950) 43 Annuaire de l'Institut de Droit International366Google Scholar
, ‘Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties’ (1949) 26 British Yearbook of International Law48Google Scholar
, The Development of International Law by the International Court (London: Stevens, 1958)Google Scholar
, The Function of Law in the International Community (Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books 1966)Google Scholar
, ‘Destabilization of the Discipline on Safeguards? Inherent Problems with the Continuing Application of Article XIX after the Settlement of the Agreement on Safeguards’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements’ (2002) 5 Journal of International Economic Law17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Legal and Political Hermeneutics, or Principles of Interpretation and Construction in Law and Politics, with Remarks on Precedents and Authorities (Boston: C.C. Little and J. Brown, 1839)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘Regional Trade Agreements Under GATT 1994: An Exception and Its Limits’ in (ed.), Challenges and Prospects for the WTO (London: Cameron May, 2005) 217Google Scholar
, ‘Adjudication’ in Jules Coleman and Scott Shapiro (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002) 206Google Scholar
, Akehurst's Modern Introduction to International Law (London: Routledge, 7th edn, 1997)Google Scholar
, ‘Reflections on a Commercial Law of Nations’ (1957) 33 British Yearbook of International Law20Google Scholar
, ‘British Treaties for the Promotion and Protection of Investments’ (1982) 52 British Yearbook of International Law241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘A Call for Coherence in International Law – Praise for the Prohibition against “Clinical Isolation” in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (1999) 33 Journal of World Trade87Google Scholar
, ‘Conflicts of Norms and Conflicts of Jurisdictions: The Relationship between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and other Treaties’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade 1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘La jurisprudence sur le principe de précaution dans le droit de l'OMC’ (Paper presented at the Inaugural Professorial Lecture, Faculty of Law, University of Geneva, 19 May 2005)
, ‘Abuse of Rights and Luxembourg Law’ in (ed.), Abuse of Rights and Equivalent Concepts: The Principle and Its Present Day Application (Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Pub. and Documentation Service 1990) 58Google Scholar
, and , The World Trade Organization: Law, Practice, and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003)Google Scholar
, ‘Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place’ (2000) 11 European Journal of International Law763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Appropriate Hierarchy of Global Multilateralism and Customary International Law: The Example of the WTO’ (2003) 44 Virginia Journal of International Law229Google Scholar
, ‘The Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(c) of the Vienna Convention’ (2005) 54 International and Comparative Law Quarterly279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Functions and Differing Legal Character of Treaties’ (1930) 11 British Yearbook of International Law100Google Scholar
, ‘Reflections on the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization (WTO): Comments on Dr Claus-Dieter Ehlermann's Lecture’ (2003) 97 American Society of International Law Proceedings87Google Scholar
, ‘What is the Future of WTO Dispute Settlement?’ (2004) 7 Journal of International Economic Law3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The International Court of Justice and the Sources of International Law’ in and (eds.), Fifty Years of the International Court of Justice (Cambridge: Grotius/Cambridge University Press, 1996) 63Google Scholar
, ‘Reservations to the Constitutions of International Organizations’ (1971) 45 British Yearbook of International Law137Google Scholar
, International Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3rd edn, 1998)Google Scholar
, ‘Does One Illegality Merit Another? The Law of Belligerent Reprisals in International Law’ (2001) 170 Military Law Review155Google Scholar
and , ‘Contractual Dispute Resolution in International Trade: The UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976) and the UNCITRAL Conciliation Rules (1980)’ (2002) 3 Melbourne Journal of International Law184Google Scholar
and , ‘Estoppel’ in (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (New York: North-Holland, 2003) vol. 2, 116Google Scholar
and , ‘Article 2(2)’ in (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2002) vol. 1, 91Google Scholar
and , ‘Necessity Revisited: Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law After Korea – Beef, EC – Asbestos and EC – Sardines’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade199Google Scholar
, ‘Pacta Sunt Servanda and Complaints in the WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2004) 1 Manchester Journal of International Economic Law76Google Scholar
, Discussion Paper No 5: The Global Textile and Clothing Industry post the Agreement on Textiles and Clothing (Geneva: World Trade Organization, 2004)Google Scholar
, ‘Looking It Up: Dictionaries and Statutory Interpretation’ (1994) 107 Harvard Law Review1437Google Scholar
and (eds.), Australian Legal Dictionary (1997)
, ‘The Case for Giving Effectiveness to GATT/WTO Rules on Developing Countries and LDCs’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Questions of International Judicial Jurisdiction in the LaGrand Case’ (2002) 15 Leiden Journal of International Law105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Basic Legal Instruments for the Liberalisation of Trade: A Comparative Analysis of EC and WTO Law (Portland: Hart Publishing, 2004)
‘From “Non-Discrimination” to “Reasonableness”: A Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law?’ (Working Paper No 01/05, Jean Monnet Centre for International and Regional Economic Law & Justice, 2005)
, ‘GATT/WTO Necessity Analysis: Evolutionary Interpretation and its Impact on the Authority of Domestic Regulation’ (2002) 29 Legal Issues of Economic Integration123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries in the World Trade Organization (Stockholm: Norstedts Tryckeri AB, 2005)Google Scholar
and , ‘“Inducing Compliance” in WTO Dispute Settlement’ in and , The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002) 646Google Scholar
and , Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization: Practice and Procedure (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2nd edn, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , ‘The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law’ (1998) 92 American Journal of International Law398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Special and Differential Treatment in the Millennium: Special for Whom and How Different?’ (2000) 23 World Economy1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Why Cancún Matters’, Second International Conference on Globalisation, Leuven, 26 November 2002, www.wto.org/english/news_e/spsp_e/spsp08_e.htm
, ‘Korean Principle of Proportionality, American Multi-Leveled Scrutiny, and Empiricist Elements in US-Korean Constitutional Jurisprudence’ (2001) 1 Journal of Korean Law105Google Scholar
, ‘Struck out Looking: Continued Confusion in Eighth Amendment Proportionality Review after Ewing v. California, 123 S. Ct. 1179 (2003)’ (2003–04) 27 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy399Google Scholar
, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach’ (2000) 94 American Journal of International Law335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Nature of WTO Obligations’ (Working Paper No 1/02, Jean Monnet Centre for International and Regional Economic Law & Justice, 2002)
, ‘The Puzzle of WTO Safeguards and Regional Trade Agreements’ (2004) 7 Journal of International Economic Law109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Countermeasures in the WTO Dispute Settlement System: An Analysis of Their Characteristics and Procedure in the Light of General International Law (Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies, 2006)Google Scholar
, The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System: International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement (London: Kluwer Law International, 1997)Google Scholar
, ‘Trade Policy as a Constitutional Problem: On the Domestic Policy Functions of International Rules’ (1996) 41 Aussenwirtschaft405Google Scholar
, ‘“Stepping on the Shoulders of a Drowning Man”: The Doctrine of Abuse of Right as a Tool for Reducing Damages for Lost Profits: Troubling Lessons from the Patuha and Himpurna Arbitrations’ (2004) 35 Georgetown Journal of International Law455Google Scholar
, ‘Defining the Undefinable: Good Faith and the United Nations Convention on the Contracts for the International Sale of Goods’ (1999) 18 Journal of Law and Commerce333Google Scholar
, ‘Interpreting World Trade Organization Agreements for the Development Objective’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade847Google Scholar
, ‘Article 2’ in (ed.), The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 2002) vol. I, 63Google Scholar
, Practical Reason and Norms (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, rev. edn, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 4th edn, 2004)Google Scholar
, ‘Do WTO Dispute Settlement Reports Affect the Obligations of Non-Parties?’ (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade883Google Scholar
, ‘A Brief Introduction to Countermeasures in the WTO Dispute Settlement System’ in and (eds.), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement: The First Ten Years (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005) 75Google Scholar
Report of the International Law Commission on the Work of Its Fifty-third Session, UN GAOR, 56th sess, Supp No 10, UN Doc A/56/10 (2001)
, ‘Rebuilding Confidence in the Multilateral Trading System: Closing the “Legitimacy Gap”’ in (ed.), The Role of the World Trade Organization in Global Governance (Tokyo: United Nations University Press, 2001) 37Google Scholar
, ‘Traditional and Modern Approaches to Customary International Law: A Reconciliation’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Expropriation in the Restatement (Revised)’ (1984) 78 American Journal of International Law176Google Scholar
and , ‘A Re-Appraisal of Non-Violation Complaints under the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures’ in et al. (eds.), The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis (New York: Springer, 2005) vol. I, 1371Google Scholar
, ‘Bilateral Treaties and Multilateral Instruments on Investment Protection’ (1997) 269 Recueil des Cours251Google Scholar
, Evolving Constitutions of International Organizations (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1996)Google Scholar
, ‘Research on General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations’ (1957) 51 American Journal of International Law734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’ (2005) 6 Journal of World Investment and Trade357Google Scholar
, ‘The Effect of Resolutions of the UN General Assembly on Customary International Law’ (1979) 73 American Society of International Law Proceedings301Google Scholar
, ‘World Trade Organization Remedies and the Assessment of Proportionality: Equivalence and Appropriateness’ (2007) 48 Harvard International Law Journal337Google Scholar
, The Scope and Application of Good Faith in the Vienna Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (Cambridge: Law School, Harvard University, 2000)Google Scholar
and (eds.), The Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edn, 1989)
, The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, 2nd edn, 1984)Google Scholar
, ‘Developing Countries in the World Trading System: From GATT, 1947, to the Third Ministerial Meeting of the WTO, 1999’ (1999) 22 World Economy1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Nondiscrimination in GATT/WTO: Was There Anything to Begin with and Is There Anything Left?’ (2005) 4 World Trade Review69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Two Standards of Good Faith in Canadian Contract Law’ (1999) 62 Saskatchewan Law Review201Google Scholar
, ‘Jurisdiction of the WTO’ (2004) 98 American Society of International Law Proceedings142Google Scholar
and , ‘When the Peace Ends: The Vulnerability of EC and US Agricultural Subsidies to WTO Legal Challenge’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Fictional Elements in Treaty Interpretation – A Study in the International Judicial Process’ (1953–55) 1 Sydney Law Review344Google Scholar
, ‘In Defence of Relative Normativity: Communitarian Values and the Nicaragua Case’ (1996) 16 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Content of the Rule against Abuse of Rights in International Law’ (1972–73) 46 British Yearbook of International Law323Google Scholar
, ‘Good Faith in Contract: Particularly in the Contracts of Arbitration and Chartering’ (2004) 35 Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce561Google Scholar
, ‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice 1960–1989: Part Two’ (1990) 61 British Yearbook of International Law1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
‘The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice’ (1998) 69 British Yearbook of International Law1Google Scholar
‘Book Review of Joost Pauwelyn, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law’ (2004) 98 American Journal of International Law855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Jurisdiction in WTO Disputes’ in and (eds.), Key Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: WTO/Cambridge University Press, 2005)Google Scholar
‘The Jurisdiction of the World Trade Organization’ (2004) 98 American Society of International Law Proceedings139Google Scholar
, ‘United States: Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations”’, European Journal of International Law: Survey of Decisions of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization, available at www.ejil.org/journal/curdevs/sr8.html
and (eds.), Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5th edn, 2002)Google Scholar
US International Trade Commission, Textiles and Apparel: Assessment of the Competitiveness of Certain Foreign Suppliers to the US Market (Publication No 3671, January 2004)
, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation Clause’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. III, 468Google Scholar
and , ‘Book Review: Good Faith in International Law’ (1992) 86 American Journal of International Law841Google Scholar
, ‘The Death of Good Faith in Treaty Jurisprudence and a Call for Resurrection’ (2005) 93 Georgetown Law Journal 1885Google Scholar
, United States Investment Treaties: Policy and Practice (Deventer, Netherlands: Kluwer Law and Taxation, 1992)Google Scholar
, ‘Denial of Justice’ in Rudolf Bernhardt (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co, 2003) vol. I, 1007Google Scholar
, ‘Review Essay: Good Faith in Public International Law’ (1983) 77 American Journal of International Law130Google Scholar
, ‘Proportionality in the Philosophy of Punishment’ (1992) 16 Crime & Justice55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
et al., ‘Abuse of Rights in Comparative Law’ in (ed.), Abuse of Rights and Equivalent Concepts: The Principle and Its Present Day Application (Strasbourg: The Council, 1990) 23Google Scholar
, WTO Litigation: Procedural Aspects of Formal Dispute Settlement (London: Cameron May, 2002)Google Scholar
, ‘The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats – Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Principle of Good Faith’ in and (eds.), The United Nations and the Principles of International Law: Essays in Memory of Michael Akehurst (London: Routledge, 1994) 230Google Scholar
and , ‘Countermeasures and Sanctions’ in (ed.), International Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003) 505Google Scholar
, Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review (Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1999)Google Scholar
, ‘The Contextual Role of a Preamble in Statutory Interpretation’ (1999) 23 Melbourne University Law Review184Google Scholar
and , ‘Limitations’ in Constitutional Law of South Africa (2nd edn, Original Service 07–06)
and , ‘What Is the Measure at Issue?’ in (ed.), Challenges and Prospects for the WTO (London: Cameron May, 2005) 115Google Scholar
, ‘“Good Faith” in the WTO Jurisprudence – Necessary Balancing Element or an Open Door to Judicial Activism’ (2005) 8 Journal of International Economic Law721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India) (Jurisdiction) [2000] ICJ Rep 12
Aerial Incident of July 27, 1955 (Preliminary Objections) (Israel v. Bulgaria) [1959] ICJ Rep 127
Application for Review of Judgment No 158 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal (Advisory Opinion) [1973] ICJ Rep 166
Article 3, Paragraph 2, of the Treaty of Lausanne (Frontier between Turkey and Iraq) (Advisory) [1925] PCIJ Series B, No 12, 6
Asylum Case (Colombia v. Peru) [1950] ICJ Rep 266
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company Ltd (Belgium v. Spain) (Merits) [1970] ICJ Rep 3
Border and Transborder Armed Actions (Nicaragua v. Honduras) (Jurisdiction and Admissibility) [1988] ICJ Rep 69
Certain Norwegian Loans (France v. Norway) (Jurisdiction) [1957] ICJ Rep 9
Conditions of Admission of a State to Membership in the United Nations (Advisory Opinion) [1948] ICJ Rep 57
Continental Shelf (Tunisia v. Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) (Application by Malta for Permission to Intervene) [1981] ICJ Rep 3
Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary in the Gulf of Maine Area (Canada v. United States of America) (Merits) [1984] ICJ Rep 246
Effect of Awards of Compensation Made by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal (Advisory Opinion) [1954] ICJ Rep 47
Factory at Chorzów (Claim for Indemnity) (Jurisdiction) [1927] PCIJ (ser A) No 9, 4
Factory at Chorzów (Claim for Indemnity) (Merits) [1928] PCIJ (ser A) No 17, 4
Fisheries (United Kingdom v. Norway) [1951] ICJ Rep 116
Free Zones of Upper Savoy and the District of Gex Case (France v. Switzerland) (Merits) [1932] PCIJ Reports Ser A/B, No 46
Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia) (Merits) [1997] ICJ Rep 7
German Interests Case (Merits) [1926] PCIJ (ser A) No 7, 4
Interpretation of the Agreement of 25 March 1951 between the WHO and Egypt (Advisory Opinion) [1980] ICJ Rep 73
Interpretation of the Greco–Turkish Agreement of December 1st, 1926 (Advisory Opinion) [1928] PCIJ (ser B) No 31, 5
Judgments of the Administrative Tribunal of the ILO upon Complaints Made against the UNESCO (Advisory Opinion) [1956] ICJ Rep 77
Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria) (Preliminary Objections) [1998] ICJ Rep 275
Land, Island and Maritime Frontier Dispute (El Salvador v. Honduras) (Application by Nicaragua for Permission to Intervene) [1990] ICJ Rep 92
Legal Consequences for States of the Continued Presence of South Africa in Namibia (South West Africa) Notwithstanding Security Council Resolution 276 (1970) (Advisory Opinion) [1971] ICJ Rep 16
Legal Status of Eastern Greenland (Denmark v. Norway) [1933] PCIJ Series A/B, No 53, 22
Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons [1996] ICJ Rep 226
Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America) (Merits) [1986] ICJ Rep 14
North Sea Continental Shelf (Federal Republic of Germany v. Denmark; Federal Republic of Germany v. Netherlands) [1969] ICJ Rep 3
Northern Cameroons (Cameroons v. United Kingdom) [1963] ICJ Rep 15
Nuclear Tests (Australia v. France) (Merits) [1974] ICJ Rep 253
Oil Platforms (Islamic Republic of Iran v. United States of America) (Merits) [2003] ICJ Rep 161
Reparation for Injuries (Advisory Opinion) [1949] ICJ Rep 174
Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Portugal v. India) (Merits) [1960] ICJ Rep 6
SS Lotus (France v. Turkey) [1927] PCIJ (ser A) No 10
Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand) (Merits) [1962] ICJ Rep 6
United Kingdom v. Iceland (Merits) [1974] ICJ Rep 3
Agreement to Arbitrate the Boundary Dispute concerning the Taba Beachfront, Egypt–Israel (1986) text in (1987) 26 ILR 1
Allen v. Wood (1897) 1898 App Cas 1
Arafura Seafood Products Pty Ltd v. Landos (1988) 16 ALD 519
Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v. Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321
Azinian, Davitian and Baca v. United Mexican States, Award, 1 November 1999, 5 ICSID Reports 269
Boundary Dispute concerning the Taba Area, Arbitration Award (1998) text in (1988) 27 ILM 1421
Bremer Vulkan v. South India Shipping [1981] AC 909
Bugmy v. The Queen (1990) 169 CLR 525
Cabell v. Markham, 148 F.2d 737, 739 (2d Cir, 1945)
Case C-104/75 de Peijper [1976] ECR 613, [16]–[29]
Case C-120/78, Cassis de Dijon [1979] ECR 649
Case C-169/91, Stoke-on-Trent [1992] ECR I-6625, [15]
Cave v. Mills (1862) 7 Hurlstone & Norman 913
Chief Constable of North Wales Police v. Evans [1982] 3 All ER 141
Claro v. Minister for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs (1993) 46 FCR 494
Coker v. Georgia, 433 US 584 (1977)
de Freitas v. Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing [1999] 1 AC 69, 80, quoting Nyambirai v. National Social Security Authority [1996] 1 LRC 64, 75
Earl of Iveagh v. Minister of Housing and Local Government [1962] 2 QB 147
Enmund v. Florida, 458 US 782 (1982)
Ewing v. California, 538 US 11 (2003)
Goldblatt v. Town of Hempstead, 369 US 590, 594–5 (1962)
Golder v. United Kingdom (1975) 18 Eur Court HR (ser A)
Handyside v. United Kingdom (1979) 1 EHRR 737
Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 US 957 (1991)
Hoare v. The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 348
Huang v. Secretary of State for the Home Department; Kashmiri v. Same [2007] UKHL 11. [2007] 2 AC 167, [19]
ICTY Decision, Decision of the Prosecutor's Appeal on Admissibility of Evidence, Prosecutor v. Aleksovski, Case No I-95–14/1-A, Appeals Chamber International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, 16 February 1999
Indo-Pakistan Western Boundary (Rann of Kutch) Case (India v. Pakistan) (1968) 50 ILR 2
Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v. Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd [1988] 1 All ER 348
Kupreskic et al. Case (IT-95–16), International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, Judgment of 14 January 2000
Lake Lanoux (France v. Spain) (Award of 16 November 1957) (1957) 18 RIAA 415
Lockyer v. Andrade, 538 US 63 (2003)
Loewen Group, Inc and Raymond L. Loewen v. United States of America, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/98/3 (Award dated 26 June 2003)
Mahon v. Air New Zealand Ltd [1984] AC 808
Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 US 319 (1976)
Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v. Pochi (1980) 44 FLR 41
Mondev International Ltd v. United States of America, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/99/2 (Notice of Arbitration dated 1 September 1999)
Mondev International Ltd v. United States of America, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/99/2 (Award dated 11 October, 2002)
Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co, 59 US (18 How) 272 (1856)
“Naulilaa” (Responsibility of Germany for Damage Caused in the Portuguese Colonies in the South of Africa) (1928) II Reports of International Arbitral Awards 1013
North Atlantic Coast Fisheries Arbitration (United States v. Great Britain) (1910) 11 RIAA 167
Prosecutor v. Blaskic Case No. IT-95–14 (Trial Chamber, ICTY, 3 March 2000)
Prosecutor v. Tadic, Case No IT-94-I-T (Trial Chamber, ICTY, 10 August 1995)
R (Daly) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532, [27] (Lord Steyn)
R (Daly) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 2 AC 532, [28] (Lord Steyn)
Re Poyser and Mills' Arbitration [1964] 2 QB 467
Schweiker v. McClure, 456 US 188 (1982)
Solem v. Helm, 463 US 277 (1983)
Tacna-Arica (Chile v. Peru) (1925) II RIAA 921
The Queen v. Shrestha (1991) 173 CLR 48
Trial Smelter Arbitration (USA v. Canada) (1949) 3 RIAA 1905
Westminster City Council v. Great Portland Street Estates plc [1985] AC 661
Award of the Arbitrator, European Communities – the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement – Recourse to Arbitration Pursuant to the Decision of 14 November 2001, WT/L/616, 1 August 2005
DSB, Minutes of Meeting Held on 20 May 1996, WT/DSB/M/17 (6 June 1996)
Minutes of Meeting Held on 11 February 2000, WT/DSB/M/75 (1 February 2000)
Minutes of Meeting Held on 19 June 2000, WT/DSB/M/84 (24 July 2000)
Minutes of Meeting Held on 5 November 2001, WT/DSB/M/112 (4 December 2001)
Minutes of Meeting Held on 27 January 2003, WT/DSB/M/142 (6 March 2003)
Minutes of Meeting Held on 18 March 2003, WT/DSB/M/145 (7 May 2003)
DSB, Special Session, ‘Negotiations on Improvements and Clarifications of the Dispute Settlement Understanding on Improving Flexibility and Member Control in WTO Dispute Settlement’, TN/DS/W/52 (14 March 2003)
‘Report by the Chairman, Ambassador Péter Balás, to the Trade Negotiations Committee’, TN/DS/9 (6 June 2003)
Contribution by the United States, TN/DS/W/74 (15 March 2005)
General Council, ‘Preparations for the Fourth Session of the Ministerial Conference: Proposal for a Framework Agreement on Special and Differential Treatment’, WT/GC/W/442 (31 July 2001)
Korea – Anti-Dumping Duties on Certain Imports of Paper from Indonesia: Communication from the Chairman of the Panel, WT/DS312/4 (25 April 2005)
Negotiating Group on Market Access, Market Access for Non-Agricultural Products – The Issue of Newly-Acceded Members: Submission by the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu, TN/MA/W/19/Add.1 (16 May 2003)
WTO Committee on Agriculture, WTO Negotiations on Agriculture: Proposals by Small Island Developing States (SIDS), G/AG/NG/W/97 and Corr.1 (29 December 2000)
WTO African Group: Joint Proposal on the Negotiations on Agriculture, G/AG/NG/W/142 (23 March 2001)
WTO Committee on Trade and Development, Implementation of Special and Differential Treatment Provisions in WTO Agreements and Decisions: Communiqué of the Fifth Annual Ministerial Meeting of Landlocked Developing Countries (LLDCs), WT/L/585, WT/COMTD/SE/2 (7 October 2004)
Note by the Secretariat, WT/COMTD/W/77 (25 October 2000)
Note on the Meeting of 12 May 2004, WT/COMTD/SE/M/7 (16 July 2004)
Proposals Submitted by the Landlocked Developing Countries: Work Programme on Small Economies, WT/COMTD/SE/W/10 (27 April 2004)
Trade and Economic Performance: The Role of Economic Size? Note by the Secretariat, WT/COMTD/SE/W/5 (23 October 2002)
Work Programme on Small Economies: Communication from Antigua and Barbuda, Barbados, Bolivia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Fiji, Guatemala, Honduras, Jamaica, Mauritius, Mongolia, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago, WT/COMTD/SE/W/12 (21 February 2005)
WTO Ministerial Conference, Accession of the People's Republic of China: Decision of 10 November 2001, WT/L/432 (23 November 2001)
Decision on Measures Concerning the Possible Negative Effects of the Reform Programme on Least-Developed and Net Food-Importing Developing Countries, LT/UR/D-1/2 (15 March 1994)
European Communities – The ACP–EC Partnership Agreement: Decision of 14 November 2001, WT/MIN(01)/15 (14 November 2001)
European Communities – The ACP–EC Partnership Agreement: Decision of 14 November 2001, WT/MIN(01)/15 (14 November 2001) Annex
European Communities – Transitional Regime for the EC Autonomous Tariff Rate Quotas on Imports of Bananas: Decision of 14 November 2001, WT/MIN(01)/16 (14 November 2001).
WTO Secretariat, ‘Developing Countries and the Multilateral Trading System: Past and Present – Background Note by the Secretariat’ (WTO High Level Symposium, 17–18 March 1999) Annex II.
‘The Fundamental WTO Principles of National Treatment, Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment and Transparency’, WT/WGTCP/W/114 (14 April 1999)
Update of WTO Dispute Settlement Cases, WT/DS/OV/31 (22 August 2007)