Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T10:57:39.882Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 8 - The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading – or when language competence interferes with reading performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2012

Mark A. Clarke
Affiliation:
University of Colorado at Denver
Get access

Summary

Reading is perhaps the most thoroughly studied and least understood process in education today. In spite of a multitude of books and journals devoted to the study and the teaching of reading, no theory of reading has won general acceptance. The quantity and variety of theoretical models of reading in the first language (L1) has resulted in a great amount of theoretical and pedagogical diversity among second language (L2) researchers and teachers (see, for example, Singer and Ruddell 1970). Recently a number of authors have cited the lack of a generally accepted theory of L2 reading as a major obstacle to teaching and testing ESL reading skills (see Eskey 1973; Harris 1976; Hatch 1973; Norris 1970; Robinett 1976). The following summary of ESL reading instruction is intended as a sampling of current practices rather than as an exhaustive account of the “state of the art.”

In low-level ESL classes, students are presented with reading tasks only after they have oral/aural familiarity with the structures and vocabulary contained in the passages. Grammar and vocabulary work consumes most of the time and effort of teachers at this level. As students' command of English improves, they are usually eased into a familiar pattern of reading instruction characterized by: 1) an introduction to concepts, vocabulary, and structure contained in a reading, followed by 2) time (in or out of class) to read the assignment and answer comprehension questions, capped off by 3) class discussion/teacher explanation of the passage and comprehension exercises (see the following texts for typical recommendations: Finocchiaro 1974; Lado 1964; Mellgren and Walker 1973a, b; Slager 1966).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×