Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- Preface
- 1 Connecting Modernities: A Global Update
- Part I Modernity as We Know It: Narratives of Modernity across the Disciplines
- Part II Modernity under Fire: Critiques, Challenges, and Revisions
- Part III In the Shadow of the Pandemic
- Part IV Imagining New Global Frameworks: Democracy and Modernity-to-Come
- Index
16 - Subjectivation, Modernity, and Hypermodernity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 April 2022
- Frontmatter
- Table of Contents
- Preface
- 1 Connecting Modernities: A Global Update
- Part I Modernity as We Know It: Narratives of Modernity across the Disciplines
- Part II Modernity under Fire: Critiques, Challenges, and Revisions
- Part III In the Shadow of the Pandemic
- Part IV Imagining New Global Frameworks: Democracy and Modernity-to-Come
- Index
Summary
Abstract
Modernity is an action, a work (deed) that transforms the relation between a human group and its environment. The notion of “subjectivation” is the way I define human societies’ discovery and their creative capacity. Meanwhile the nation/states’ withdrawal into themselves, the closure of the borders to the full scope of globalization, and the acceptance or refusal of migrants become the central issue of all sociopolitical conflicts, replacing the previous labor-based conflicts that have been at the core of the industrial society. Sociological analysis today addresses the fundamental issue: What is the future of democracy? The answer lies in criticism vis-à-vis the idea of states and institutions as agents of democracy, and the assertion of a social definition of democracy.
Keywords: subjectivation; hypermodernity; desocialization; modernity and sexuality; refugees
What best defines what I call “hypermodernity” is an advanced acknowledgement of the Self, individual or collective, as a subject – also definable as the subjectivation of the self. It is for this reason that I have insisted that all sociologists should replace the topic of “fraternity” from the famous French national motto of “liberty, equality, fraternity” – which has bolstered the most extremist stances, those of Hébertists, for example – with the topic of “dignity,” meaning the acknowledgement of subjectivation within the individual. Of course, we should not interpret subjectivation as only an individual or individualist process. As I have noted before, the topic of subjectivation might indeed be associated with “desocialization” – but one must not take this idea too far, as we must always keep a firm distance between the individual and the subject. This is not just an analytical detail, but a fundamental assertion about the very nature of subjectivation. Indeed, my main intention has always been the reintroduction into sociological analysis – strongly, and almost violently – of the notion of the subject, following a long period defined by the ideological exclusion of this concept.
Reintroducing the logic of subjectivation at an individual level is certainly a key characteristic of our post-industrial era. This element contrasts with approaches which can be defined as Marxian, and which we find in most working-class movements and particularly within communist currents that attach a great importance to the party. The significance of human rights at an individual level cannot be overestimated in terms of its importance for the topic of subjectivation.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Global Modernity from Coloniality to PandemicA Cross-Disciplinary Perspective, pp. 371 - 386Publisher: Amsterdam University PressPrint publication year: 2022