Legal Professions

Lynette J. Chua; David M. Engel; Sida Liu

doi:10.1017/9781108864824.007

6 - Legal Professions

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2023

Lynette J. Chua ,

David M. Engel and

Sida Liu

Show author details

Lynette J. Chua: Affiliation:
National University of Singapore
David M. Engel: Affiliation:
State University of New York, Buffalo
Sida Liu: Affiliation:
The University of Hong Kong

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The legal professions in Asia are a plural concept. Many Asian countries are civil law jurisdictions in which lawyers, judges, and prosecutors are separately licensed. Even in common law jurisdictions, lawyers rarely are a homogeneous group. Moreover, there are paralegal or unauthorized occupational groups that parallel the profession of lawyers. The meaning of being a “lawyer” in Asia, therefore, is often more complex and controversial than in North American or European contexts. The different types of legal professions range from barristers and solicitors in Hong Kong and unified legal professions in other former British colonies, to Continental-style judges and prosecutors in Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, Soviet-style “iron triangles” of police, procurators, and judges in China and Central Asia, and to unlicensed “barefoot” lawyers across the continent. This chapter provides an overview of the plurality of legal professions and their demographic and sociological characteristics. It goes on to highlight the legal service market, demonstrating the connections between lawyers and different kinds of clients and practice areas, and the interactions between the legal professions, judicial system, and state. The chapter concludes with readings on the role of lawyers in transforming the state—and the impact of state transformations on lawyers themselves.

Keywords

legal profession lawyer

Type: Chapter
Information: The Asian Law and Society Reader , pp. 227 - 272

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108864824.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Ballakrishnen, Swethaa S. 2019. “Just Like Global Firms: Unintended Gender Parity and Speculative Isomorphism in India’s Elite Professions.” Law & Society Review 53 (1): 108–40. doi: 10.1111/lasr.12381Google Scholar

Chan, Kay-Wah. 2012. “Setting the Limits: Who Controls the Size of the Legal Profession in Japan?” International Journal of the Legal Profession 19 (2–3): 321–37. doi: 10.1080/09695958.2012.783990CrossRef Google Scholar

Galanter, Marc, and Robinson, Nick. 2013. “India’s Grand Advocates: A Legal Elite Flourishing in the Era of Globalization.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 20(3): 241–65. doi: 10.1080/09695958.2014.912359CrossRef Google Scholar

Gillespie, John. 2013. “The Juridification of Cause Advocacy in Socialist Asia: Vietnam as a Case Study.” Wisconsin International Law Journal 31: 672–701.Google Scholar

Hsu, Ching-fang. 2019. “The Political Origins of Professional Identity: Lawyers, Judges, and Prosecutors in Taiwan’s State Transformation.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 6 (2): 321–46. doi: 10.1017/als.2018.35CrossRef Google Scholar

Lev, Daniel S. 1976. “Origins of the Indonesian Advocacy.” Indonesia 21: 135–69. doi: 10.2307/3350960CrossRef Google Scholar

Liu, Sida. 2011. “Lawyers, State Officials and Significant Others: Symbiotic Exchange in the Chinese Legal Services Market.” The China Quarterly 206: 276–93. doi: 10.1017/S0305741011000269Google Scholar

Shafqat, Sahar. 2018. “Civil Society and the Lawyers’ Movement of Pakistan.” Law & Social Inquiry 43 (3): 889–914. doi: 10.1111/lsi.12283Google Scholar

Tam, Waikung. 2013. Legal Mobilization under Authoritarianism: The Case of Post-Colonial Hong Kong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139424394.009Google Scholar

Tungnirun, Arm. 2018. “Practising on the Moon: Globalization and Legal Consciousness of Foreign Corporate Lawyers in Myanmar.” Asian Journal of Law and Society 5 (1): 49–67. doi: 10.1017/als.2017.30CrossRef Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001Google Scholar

Abel, Richard L. 1989. American Lawyers. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Heinz, John P. and Laumann, Edward O.. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage Foundation. doi: 10.2307/2578996Google Scholar

Michelson, Ethan. 2007. “Lawyers, Political Embeddedness, and Institutional Continuity in China’s Transition from Socialism.” American Journal of Sociology 113 (2): 352–414. doi: 10.1086/518907CrossRef Google Scholar

Ota, Shozo, and Rokumoto, Kahei. 1993. “Issues of the Lawyer Population: Japan.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 25: 315–32.Google Scholar

Schmitthener, Samuel. 1968. “A Sketch of the Development of the Legal Profession in India.” Law & Society Review 3: 337–82. doi: 10.2307/3053007CrossRef Google Scholar

Fu, Hualing, and Cullen, Richard. 2011. “Climbing the Weiquan Ladder: A Radicalizing Process for Rights-Protection Lawyers.” The China Quarterly 205: 40–59. doi:10.1017/S0305741010001384Google Scholar

Ishida, Kyoko. 2017. “Deterioration or Refinement? Impacts of an Increasing Number of Lawyers on the Lawyer Discipline System in Japan.” International Journal of the Legal Profession 24: 243–57. doi: 10.1080/09695958.2017.1324557Google Scholar

Rajah, Jothie, and Thiruvengadam, Arun K.. 2013. “Of Absences, Masks, and Exceptions: Cause Lawyering in Singapore.” Wisconsin International Law Journal 31: 646–71.Google Scholar