Book contents
- African Genesis:
- Series page
- African Genesis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 African Genesis: an evolving paradigm
- 2 Academic genealogy
- Part I In search of origins: evolutionary theory, new species and paths into the past
- Part II Hominin morphology through time: brains, bodies and teeth
- 8 Hominin brain evolution, 1925–2011: an emerging overview
- 9 The issue of brain reorganisation in Australopithecus and early hominids: Dart had it right
- 10 The mass of the human brain: is it a spandrel?
- 11 Origin and diversity of early hominin bipedalism
- 12 Forelimb adaptations in Australopithecus afarensis
- 13 Hominin proximal femur morphology from the Tugen Hills to Flores
- 14 Daily rates of dentine formation and root extension rates in Paranthropus boisei, KNM-ER 1817, from Koobi Fora, Kenya
- 15 On the evolutionary development of early hominid molar teeth and the Gondolin Paranthropus molar
- 16 Digital South African fossils: morphological studies using reference-based reconstruction and electronic preparation
- Part III Modern human origins: patterns and processes
- Part IV In search of context: hominin environments, behaviour and lithic cultures
- Index
- Plate Section
12 - Forelimb adaptations in Australopithecus afarensis
from Part II - Hominin morphology through time: brains, bodies and teeth
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2012
- African Genesis:
- Series page
- African Genesis
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgements
- 1 African Genesis: an evolving paradigm
- 2 Academic genealogy
- Part I In search of origins: evolutionary theory, new species and paths into the past
- Part II Hominin morphology through time: brains, bodies and teeth
- 8 Hominin brain evolution, 1925–2011: an emerging overview
- 9 The issue of brain reorganisation in Australopithecus and early hominids: Dart had it right
- 10 The mass of the human brain: is it a spandrel?
- 11 Origin and diversity of early hominin bipedalism
- 12 Forelimb adaptations in Australopithecus afarensis
- 13 Hominin proximal femur morphology from the Tugen Hills to Flores
- 14 Daily rates of dentine formation and root extension rates in Paranthropus boisei, KNM-ER 1817, from Koobi Fora, Kenya
- 15 On the evolutionary development of early hominid molar teeth and the Gondolin Paranthropus molar
- 16 Digital South African fossils: morphological studies using reference-based reconstruction and electronic preparation
- Part III Modern human origins: patterns and processes
- Part IV In search of context: hominin environments, behaviour and lithic cultures
- Index
- Plate Section
Summary
This chapter explores upper limb adaptation in Australopithecus afarensis in order to identify possible adaptations to behaviours other than arboreality. Limb length proportions and elbow articular morphology suggest that the upper limb of A. afarensis does not display a morphology that implies strong directional, or even stabilising selection, for arboreality. On the other hand, many traits suggest that A. afarensis adapted to use of the upper limbs for manipulation. The species had no carpometacarpal ligament between the second metacarpal and the capitate, a curved and more proximally oriented second metacarpal-capitate articular surface, and a more coronally and transversally oriented trapezio-second metacarpal facet. All these traits allow for rotation of the second metacarpal during manipulation. In addition, the second and third metacarpal heads of A. afarensis are tapered with a marked asymmetry in distal view. In palmar view, the articular facet of the A. afarensis second metacarpal is also asymmetrical, with the radial size projecting more proximally and palmarly than the ulnar side. This results in pronation of the second finger during flexion, which allows the finger to conform to the shape of the manipulated object. Again, this list of traits is found only in humans among extant hominoids. Other traits such as a relatively longer thumb and a proximally oriented olecranon also suggest that A. afarensis had adapted to manipulatory activities. The absence of archaeological sites contemporaneous with A. afarensis may be due to various factors, such as the use of perishable material, the absence of a home base or of foraging route standardisation, and so forth. In conclusion, it is not possible to positively demonstrate that A. afarensis made or used tools without finding fossil remains in association with tools, but their morphology is consistent with the finger dexterity and the positioning of hands close to the body that are part of toolmaking and tool-using activities, a novel behaviour for hominins. If A. afarensis was still indeed a habitual arboreal animal, its upper limbs show a compromise for this novel behaviour that was extremely important and that, perhaps, was made possible by the adoption of bipedal stance.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- African GenesisPerspectives on Hominin Evolution, pp. 223 - 247Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012
- 5
- Cited by