Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 1 - Gentlemen versus Petty Men

  • from Part I - Dual Faces of the Song State
  • Charles Hartman, University at Albany, State University of New York
  • Book:
    Structures of Governance in Song Dynasty China, 960–1279 CE
    Published online:
    30 March 2023
    Print publication:
    06 April 2023, pp 27-44
    • Chapter
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Summary

    Chapter 1 examines the bipolarity of junzi 君子 (gentlemen) versus xiaoren 小人 (petty men) as a fundamental contrast of Song political discourse. Many historians of Song understand these terms in their original moral context from the Zhou-era Confucian classics and therefore dismiss this distinction as antiquated philosophical rhetoric. But the eleventh-century Confucian resurgence, led by Fan Zhongyan and Ouyang Xiu, brought these ancient constructs once again to the center of political theory and practice. The chapter explains how the junzi/xiaoren contrast quickly came to define the eleventh-century Confucians’ view of themselves as a self-identifying political group committed to governing through institutionalist principles, and how this junzi/xiaoren dichotomy became the center of a Confucian political rhetoric that defined its opposition as those who did not support this vision. Lastly, the duty of the emperor to govern by distinguishing between junzi and xiaoren among his officials became a fundament tenet of Confucian institutionalism.