We evaluated the outcomes and adverse events after fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) using the Solomon technique in comparison to the selective technique. A retrospective analysis of a single-center consecutive cohort of FLS-treated TTTS using the selective (January 2010 to July 2014) and Solomon (August 2014 to December 2017) techniques was performed. Among 395 cases, 227 underwent selective coagulation and 168 underwent the Solomon technique. The incidence rates of recurrent TTTS (Solomon vs. selective: 0% vs. .9%, p = .510) and twin anemia–polycythemia sequence (.6% vs. .4%, p = .670) were very low in both groups. The incidence rates of placental abruption (Solomon vs. selective: 10.7% vs. 3.5%, p = .007) and preterm premature rupture of the membranes (pPROM) with subsequent delivery before 32 weeks (20.2% vs. 7.1%, p < .001) were higher in the Solomon group. The median birth recipient weight was significantly smaller in the Solomon group (1790 g vs. 1933 g, p = .049). The rate of survival of at least one twin was significantly higher in the Solomon group (98.2% vs. 93.8%, p = .046). The Solomon technique and total laser energy were significant risk factors for pPROM (odds ratio: 2.64, 1.07, 95% CI [1.32, 5.28], [1.01, 1.13], p = .006, p = .014, respectively). These findings suggest that the Solomon technique led to superior survival outcomes but increased risks of placental abruption, pPROM and fetal growth impairment. Total laser energy was associated with the occurrence of pPROM. Close attention to adverse events is required for perinatal management after FLS to treat TTTS using the Solomon technique.

Objective: Laser ablation of all placental vascular anastomoses is the optimal treatment for twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). However, two important controversies are apparent in the literature: (a) a gap between concept and performance, and (b) controversy regarding whether all the anastomoses can be identified endoscopically and whether blind lasering of healthy placenta is justified. The purpose of this article is: (a) to address the potential source of the gap between concept and performance by analyzing the fundamental steps needed to successfully accomplish the surgery, and (b) to discuss the resulting competency benchmarks reported with the different surgical techniques. Materials and Methods: Laser surgery for TTTS can be broken down into two fundamental steps: (1) endoscopic identification of the placental vascular anastomoses, (2) laser ablation of the anastomoses. The two steps are not synonymous: (a) regarding the endoscopic identification of the anastomoses, the non-selective technique is based upon lasering all vessels crossing the dividing membrane, whether anastomotic or not. The selective technique identifies and lasers only placental vascular anastomoses. The Solomon technique is based on the theory that not all anastomoses are endoscopically visible and thus involves lasering healthy areas of the placenta between lasered anastomoses, (b) regarding the actual laser ablation of the anastomoses, successful completion of the surgery (i.e., lasering all the anastomoses) can be measured by the rate of persistent or reverse TTTS (PRTTTS) and how often a selective technique can be achieved. Articles representing the different techniques are discussed. Results: The non-selective technique is associated with the lowest double survival rate (35%), compared with 60–75% of the Solomon or the Quintero selective techniques. The Solomon technique is associated with a 20% rate of residual patent placental vascular anastomoses, compared to 3.5–5% for the selective technique (p < .05). Both the Solomon and the selective technique are associated with a 1% risk of PRTTTS. Adequate placental assessment is highest with the selective technique (99%) compared with the Solomon (80%) or the ‘standard’ (60%) techniques (p < .05). A surgical performance index is proposed. Conclusion: The Quintero selective technique was associated with the highest rate of successful ablation and lowest rate of PRTTTS. The Solomon technique represents a historical backward movement in the identification of placental vascular anastomoses and is associated with higher rate of residual patent vascular communications. The reported outcomes of the Quintero selective technique do not lend support to the existence of invisible anastomoses or justify lasering healthy placental tissue.

Objective: To investigate the occurrence of early-onset neonatal sepsis (EOS) in twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) managed with laser surgery.

Study design: We performed a prospective cohort study of all consecutive TTTS cases treated with laser surgery (TTTS group) delivered at the Leiden University Medical Center. We recorded the occurrence of EOS, defined as a positive blood culture ≤72 hours postpartum (proven sepsis) or administration of a full course of antibiotics due to risk factors or signs of sepsis, in the absence of a positive blood culture (suspected sepsis). Perinatal variables in the TTTS group were compared with uncomplicated monochorionic twins (no-TTTS group). A multivariate model was generated, examining the association between EOS and gestational age at birth, interval between laser surgery and birth, anterior placenta, laser period (first study period: 2002–2008; second study period: 2009–2015), and preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM).

Results: The rates of combined suspected and proven EOS in the TTTS group and no-TTTS group were 16% (68/416) and 10% (55/542), respectively (relative ratio [RR] 1.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19–2.55). Multivariate analysis showed that EOS in the TTTS group was independently associated with lower gestational age at birth (odds ratio [OR] 0.75, 95% CI 0.63–0.88), first study period (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.08–4.67) and PPROM (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.28–4.75).

Conclusion: The rate of EOS in the TTTS group is low, but increased compared to the no-TTTS group. EOS in TTTS is independently associated with premature delivery, earlier laser period, and PPROM.

Twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) is a severe complication of monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies associated with high perinatal mortality and morbidity rates. Management in TTTS is a major challenge for obstetricians and neonatologists. Twins with TTTS are often born prematurely after an extremely distressing and highly hazardous fetal period. Follow-up studies report varying rates of cerebral palsy (CP) and long-term neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI). This review discusses the latest findings on the long-term outcome of TTTS survivors, possible risk factors for long-term impairment, and provides recommendations for future research.

This review addresses the physiology of monochorionic diamniotic (MC/DA) twins and the potential for twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). It focuses on the underlying cardiovascular pathophysiology of TTTS and the cardiovascular impact of TTTS for both the recipient and the donor twin. It explains the principles for assessment and monitoring of these cardiovascular changes and how these may be used to guide pregnancy management. Finally, it describes the effect of treatment on the altered hemodynamics and how this can influence pregnancy and perinatal management, as well as longer-term follow-up.

We present a case of severe aortic coarctation in a donor of twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Patients underwent two angioplasty procedures at age 7 and 47 days, weighing 900 and 1500 g, respectively. Umbilical artery approach was used in the first procedure, and femoral artery approach was used in the second. Follow-up at the age of 13 months showed no recurrence of coarctation.

Twin–twin transfusion syndrome is a major complication of monochorionic twin pregnancies. In foetuses from monochorionic twinning the presence of increased nuchal translucency thickness (NT) has been associated with an increased risk of developing this syndrome. One of the presumed mechanisms of increased NT is early cardiac failure, indirectly indicated by abnormal blood flow in the ductus venosus. We present eleven cases of monochorionic twin pregnancies in which nuchal translucency thickness and ductus venosus blood flow evaluation was performed at 11–14 weeks. In the two cases presenting with nuchal translucency discrepancy between the two foetuses along with anomalous ductus venosus blood flow in the foetus with increased nuchal translucency, twin–twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) eventually developed. In none of the twins displaying no inter-twin difference in NT measurements and in those with discrepant NT but normal flow in both ductus venosus, was the progression to TTTS observed. In the two cases which developed TTTS, foetoscopic laser coagulation of the vascular anastomosis was successfully carried out at 18 weeks and normalisation of the venous return was registered. These findings suggest that the association of increased NT and abnormal flow in the ductus venosus in monochorionic twins may be an early manifestation of haemodynamic imbalance between the donor and the recipient eventually manifested as twin–twin transfusion syndrome. Further studies, however, are necessary to establish the potential role of the combination of NT and ductus venosus blood flow assessment as a screening method for TTTS. Twin Research (2000) 3, 65–70.