Two new sets of scoring matrices are introduced: H2 for the protein sequence comparison and T2 for the protein sequence–structure correlation. Each element of H2 or T2 measures the frequency with which a pair of amino acid types in one protein, k-residues apart in the sequence, is aligned with another pair of residues, of given amino acid types (for H2) or in given structural states (for T2), in other structurally homologous proteins. There are four types, corresponding to the k-values of 1 to 4, for both H2 and T2. These matrices were set up using a large number of structurally homologous protein pairs, with little sequence homology between the pair, that were recently generated using the structure comparison program SHEBA.

The two scoring matrices were incorporated into the main body of the sequence alignment program SSEARCH in the FASTA package and tested in a fold recognition setting in which a set of 107 test sequences were aligned to each of a panel of 3,539 domains that represent all known protein structures. Six procedures were tested; the straight Smith-Waterman (SW) and FASTA procedures, which used the Blosum62 single residue type substitution matrix; BLAST and PSI-BLAST procedures, which also used the Blosum62 matrix; PASH, which used Blosum62 and H2 matrices; and PASSC, which used Blosum62, H2, and T2 matrices. All procedures gave similar results when the probe and target sequences had greater than 30% sequence identity. However, when the sequence identity was below 30%, a similar structure could be found for more sequences using PASSC than using any other procedure. PASH and PSI-BLAST gave the next best results.

Methods for protein structure (3D)–sequence (1D) compatibility evaluation (threading) have been developed during the past decade. The protocol in which a sequence can recognize its compatible structure in the structural library (i.e., the fold recognition or the forward-folding search) is available for the structure prediction of new proteins. However, the reverse protocol, in which a structure recognizes its homologous sequences among a sequence database, named the inverse-folding search, is a more difficult application. In this study, we have investigated the feasibility of the latter approach. A structural library, composed of about 400 well-resolved structures with mutually dissimilar sequences, was prepared, and 163 of them had remote homologs in the library. We examined whether they could correctly seek their homologs by both forward- and inverse-folding searches. The results showed that the inverse-folding protocol is more effective than the forward-folding protocol, once the reference states of the compatibility functions are appropriately adjusted. This adjustment only slightly affects the ability of the forward-folding search. We noticed that the scoring, in which a given sequence is re-mounted onto a structure according to the 3D–1D alignment determined by the dynamic programming method, is only effective in the forward-folding protocol and not in the inverse-folding protocol. Namely, the inverse-folding search works significantly better with the score given by the 3D–1D alignment per se, rather than that obtained by the re-mounting. The implications of these results are discussed.

In the past few years, a new generation of fold recognition methods has been developed, in which the classical sequence information is combined with information obtained from secondary structure and, sometimes, accessibility predictions. The results are promising, indicating that this approach may compete with potential-based methods (Rost B et al., 1997, J Mol Biol 270:471–480). Here we present a systematic study of the different factors contributing to the performance of these methods, in particular when applied to the problem of fold recognition of remote homologues.

Our results indicate that secondary structure and accessibility prediction methods have reached an accuracy level where they are not the major factor limiting the accuracy of fold recognition. The pattern degeneracy problem is confirmed as the major source of error of these methods. On the basis of these results, we study three different options to overcome these limitations: normalization schemes, mapping of the coil state into the different zones of the Ramachandran plot, and post-threading graphical analysis.