We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Exclusionary discipline practices, in US public schools, have a historic, disproportionate, negative impact on black and Hispanic American youth, in particular those receiving special education services. Use and overuse of exclusionary discipline limits students’ ability to access academic and social success. At its root, exclusionary discipline is a civil and human rights issue. Beginning in the mid-twentieth century, social justice movements internationally and in the United States served an important means to achieve and sustain civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights of individuals. This chapter provides a broad context for these civil, disability and human rights-based movements and connects to current social justice approaches in education, schoolwide positive behavioral support (SWPBIS) and the potential for SWPBIS to act as a vehicle for social justice in school discipline. Over twenty years of evidence document that SWPBIS is an empirically valid systems approach to reducing exclusionary discipline. Recent adaptations to SWPBIS align with recommendations from 2014 guidelines from the federal Department of Education to explicitly address disciplinary equity. The result has been state, district, and regional impact on disciplinary equity, and decreases in the social and academic gap between black, Hispanic, students with individualized education programs, and their white peers.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.