Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 5 - Variations between Judges

  • Sondre Torp Helmersen, Universitetet i Tromsø, Norway
  • Book:
    The Application of Teachings by the International Court of Justice
    Published online:
    04 March 2021
    Print publication:
    04 March 2021, pp 131-156

  • Summary

    This chapter shows that different ICJ judges seem to assign different weight to teachings. The judges vary greatly in how often they cite teachings (if they cite them at all), and in how they use teachings when citing them. The chapter places the judges in three categories: those who frequently cite teachings and assign them considerable weight, those who occasionally cite teachings and assign them less weight, and those who never cite teachings. The chapter also suggests factors that can explain the variations, with the best one being the judges’ personal philosophies and styles. Judges who are former academics cite more teachings than others, and non-Western judges cite more teachings than their Western counterparts. These correlations may also contribute to explaining the variations between the judges.