We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Caroline Humfress explores the distinctive relationship between sacred (Christian) temporality and (Western) ‘hermeneutics of the state’, through a focus upon the founding texts of the Civilian legal tradition: the sixth-century CE Digest, Code and Institutes. Part 1 analyses the Emperor Justinian’s claim that these law-books were to be ‘valid for all eternity’ through a series of close textual readings of the same law-books’ prefatory constitutions. Part 2 contextualises Justinian’s lawyerly invocation of ‘eternity’ within contemporary Eastern Christological disputes, including a set of theological debates, orchestrated by Justinian himself, that took place at the same time (and location) as his law-books were being compiled. Part 3 concludes by arguing that the ‘timeless’, rational, universal, authority of the Civilian Legal tradition – as explored in the chapter by Ryan – was in fact underpinned by a specific Eastern (‘Byzantine’) sacred temporality.
Across East Asia, the period after the Mongol retreat was one of rebuilding and reordering. As they solidified political power, new regimes in China, Korea and Japan aggressively established authority over the religious realm, demanding compliance with moral and ritual norms, managing certain types of religious pluralism and violently crushing deviant devotion and organised religious resistance. Violence pervaded religion itself. Theological exploration of ideas such as cosmic destruction and rebirth, divine retribution, enforcer deities and the morality of killing for a greater good created stylised roles for both victims and perpetrators of violence. These themes manifested differently across the region. After Japanese militarists destroyed Buddhist mountain strongholds, lay armies defending the dharma fought with the ferocity of the faithful. Persecuted Christian converts willingly met martyrdom in the Catholic idiom. In China, the undercurrent of millenarian ideas that circulated through banned texts and teachings proved impossible to contain. These ideas could quickly militarise in response to stress, feeding a devastating cycle of rebellion and repression that continued through the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Across the region, temples and monasteries fought for resources, and religious affiliations often provided a spark for local tensions to erupt into organised violence.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.