We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The rediscovery of Gregor Mendel’s studies on plant hybridization at the beginning of the twentieth century marks the starting point of modern genetic research. Many acknowledge the fact that Mendelism informed early twentieth-century hereditarian and eugenic thinking in Germany and in the US. But the view of Mendelism itself remains that of a mechanical, ideologically neutral, possibly even anti-racist theory. Eugenicists’ adoption of Mendelian thinking is often seen as dogmatic, overtly simplistic and pseudo-scientific. The moral and analytical benefit of using the label "pseudo-science" when discussing eugenics/racial-hygiene and racial science is, however, greatly limited. Mendelism was a sound and rich theory, and the attempts to apply it to the human domain were genuine and serious. It was also a theory with clear social and political implications, which changed its function as the decades passed and as it was appropriated by scholars working in different scientific realms (anthropology, psychiatry, genealogy) and as it moved between the social and the political domains. It strongly imprinted Nazi sterilization and antisemitic policies and had lasting impact well after 1945.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.