Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 9 - Who and What Should Be Eligible for Redress?

  • from Part III
  • Stephen Winter, University of Auckland
  • Book:
    Monetary Redress for Abuse in State Care
    Published online:
    18 November 2022
    Print publication:
    01 December 2022, pp 139-160
    • Chapter
      • You have access
      • Open access
    • PDF
    • HTML
    • Export citation

  • Summary

    This chapter explores what a flexible approach to eligibility entails for state redress programmes. Setting parameters for eligible claims necessarily involves a series of difficult trade-offs. The parameters of eligibility also have significant operative implications, helping determine the evidence a survivor needs to provide, which, in turn, is an important factor in determining the quantity, and character, of the information a programme needs to manage. The trade-offs involved support the argument for flexible redress programmes that enable survivors to choose how they will pursue redress.