We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Though similar in construction to landscapes, early Chinese tu were plans of definite spatial consequence, their definition resting not so much on their appearance as on their function and syntax, composed in a way that was legible and efficacious. The pacing out of the territories represented in tu likely also signaled a personal or ritual investiture. In both early Chinese landscapes and terrestrial maps, spatial representations changed across their face, of either visual vantage point or temporal relations between locales. Maps thus were prone to distortion or even falsification. Further complicating the maps’ legibility is whether their markings of human activity and construction are descriptive or prescriptive. The mensurative challenges involved in reading maps are magnified by the aesthetic conventions and features that impacted mapmaking. To best understand how such maps might have been read or deciphered would involve analyzing how they became defunct, illegible, to analyze what was regarded as an “error” in the map.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.