Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 8 - Life “Itself”

  • from Part II - New Objects of Enquiry
  • Edited by Sherryl Vint, University of California, Riverside
  • Book:
    After the Human
    Published online:
    26 November 2020
    Print publication:
    10 December 2020, pp 120-133

  • Summary

    Changing practices in contemporary biosciences and biotechnology have altered definitions and understandings of what we call “life”—what we mean by this term, what constitutes life, and how human and nonhuman others experience life. This chapter explores the shifting definitions of life within the biosciences, and beyond—which have emerged due to specific bioscientific/biotech advancements and changing political-economic imperatives and governing logics that have emerged during the latter half of the twentieth century. Increasingly, now, life as we know it has come to be manipulated, customized, optimized, maximized, and commodified. The chapter considers how life is increasingly technologized, how life is now understood as an ‘open dynamism,’ how life is something now viewed as subject to self-governance, and how life has become a domain of biovalue. While concepts of life and life-making strategies might have altered, historic inequities have not receded but are instead re-secured and often exacerbated.