Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 19 - Critical and Literary Theory

  • from Part III - Cultural Transfers
  • Edited by Petra Rau, University of East Anglia, William T. Rossiter, University of East Anglia
  • Book:
    Europe in British Literature and Culture
    Published online:
    06 June 2024
    Print publication:
    13 June 2024, pp 306-321

  • Summary

    British literary criticism and theory have always been primarily focused on meaning and on value, that is, on the interpretation and evaluation of literary texts. Equally characteristic are their strong sense of having a social mission and their interest in the social value of texts. On the continent, criticism and theory developed in a wholly different, ‘scientific’ direction. The Russian Formalists tried to define the ‘literariness’ of literary texts, the Prague Linguistic Circle introduced the notion of ‘structure’, phenomenologists were concerned with the ontological status of the literary work, and the structuralists of the 1960s and after analysed that narrative and its presentation, with interpretation and evaluation always playing a marginal role. The advent of poststructuralism – whose reception in the UK was markedly different from that in the United States – brought the two traditions substantially closer to each other, but there has not been a real convergence.