Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 9 - New Mexico

  • from Part II - Change as Court Modernization or Good Government
  • Herbert M. Kritzer
  • Book:
    Judicial Selection in the States
    Published online:
    06 April 2020
    Print publication:
    30 April 2020, pp 184-203

  • Summary

    Efforts to end the use of partisan elections for judicial selection and retention in New Mexico date back to the 1930s. Twice, the state legislatures sent voters a constitutional amendment that included a Missouri Plan system, in 1951 and again in 1982, but both times the voters rejected it. In 1988, the legislature and voters approved a new system that retained an element of partisan elections; approval occurred despite that it again raised the specter of voters surrendering their power to select judges. In principle, all vacancies are now filled by gubernatorial appointment from a short list provided by a nominating commission. However, appointees must stand in a partisan election at the first general election after their appointment; this includes the need to obtain the nomination of a political party. After winning a partisan election, either as the appointed incumbent or as the challenger, judges stand for subsequent terms in retention elections. There is still an occasional open-seat election when an appointee fails to obtain the nomination of his or her political party.