Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 2 - Policies and Counterstrategies

  • from Part I - Ruling the Empire through the Principle of Filiality
  • Yue Du, Cornell University, New York
  • Book:
    State and Family in China
    Published online:
    29 October 2021
    Print publication:
    11 November 2021, pp 60-92

  • Summary

    Chapter 2 explores how local actors exploited legally sanctioned filiality to advance their perceived interests in court: Widowed mothers monopolized property of households legally headed by their grown-up sons; parents in difficult economic situations killed their small children to frame their creditors, with the understanding that imperial law assigned little weight to filicide; people resorted to false accusations of lack of filial piety to kickstart their cases or to incriminate their adversaries. The Qing state tolerated or even connived at such local manipulations, despite significant administrative costs and compromise of other established legal and moral principles, which enabled the state to co-opt local actors’ initiative to shape society and reinforce normative notions of parent–child relations.