This is the first ever English translation of Heisenberg’s unpublished response to the EPR paper. In this chapter, Heisenberg uses his famous cut argument to argue against the possibility of hidden variables.

This chapter introduces in more comprehensive fashion than elsewhere in the literature the interesting role of Heisenberg in the EPR debate. Although we have already published an analysis of Heisenberg’s posthumously published draft response to EPR, only now are we able to situate this excellent primary source in its fullest context, by contributing a chapter describing, for example, Heisenberg’s thinking prior to EPR about interacting systems and hidden variables, the crucial role of Grete Hermann for Heisenberg’s thinking about separability, completeness and observational context, and describing the correspondence between Heisenberg and Bohr discussing Heisenberg’s manuscript.

This chapter begins a short, two-chapter section on calculations that specifically impact the philosophy of quantum mechanics. A quantitative discussion of the famous Einstein–Podalsky–Rosen (EPR) experiment is given, as well as a mathematical discussion of problems with the many-worlds hypothesis, the Bohmian pilot-wave hypothesis, and the “transactional” hypothesis for interpreting quantum mechanics.

After having shown in previous chapters that wave-particle duality is not a fundamental problem for quantum mechanics, this chapter introduces the really strange effect of quantum mechanics, namely “nonlocal correlations” that appear to act over long distances faster than the speed of light. The “Copenhagen” interpretation of quantum mechanics is introduced, which puts human knowledge in a special role, and some of the philosophical objections to it.

We present a few of the gedanken- and real experiments that demonstrate the spookiness of quantum mechanics. We discuss the Einstein,Podolsky, and Rosengedankenexperiment that invokes hidden variables to create a paradox. We analyze Bell’s analysis of the paradox, which shows that the predictions of quantum mechanics are inconsistent with local hidden variable theories. We discuss the Schrödinger cat paradox, and the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics.