Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 5 - The Possibility of Natural Philosophy According to Plato I: The Logical Basis

  • Barbara M. Sattler, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Germany
  • Book:
    The Concept of Motion in Ancient Greek Thought
    Published online:
    28 September 2020
    Print publication:
    08 October 2020, pp 202-244

  • Summary

    Chapter 5 examines the development of the logical basis required for natural philosophy in Plato. In particular it shows how Plato in the Sophist develops further understanding not only of negation and the connection operator, but also, in connection with this, the principle of non-contradiction. These developments allow for connecting Being and non-Being, which is necessary for making sense of motion without falling into inconsistencies. The chapter then examines Plato’s employment of the principle of sufficient reason and the criterion of rational admissibility in the Timaeus. He develops the principle of sufficient reason further by distinguishing for the first time between necessary and rational reasons. And rational admissibility is taken up by Plato in the way used by the atomists: that is, the basic ontological constituents not only have to be testable by our own reason, but they also have to explain the phenomena. These requirements together emerge as Plato’s standards for natural philosophy and cosmology by being the positive criteria an eikôs mythos has to fulfil.