Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Epilogue - The Separation of the Wheat from the Chaff

  • from Section 3 - Epilepsy: The Paradigm of the Suffering of Both Body and Soul in Disease
  • Simon D. Shorvon, Institute of Neurology, University College London
  • Book:
    The Idea of Epilepsy
    Published online:
    13 January 2023
    Print publication:
    02 February 2023, pp 585-629

  • Summary

    The understanding of epilepsy in 2020 is compared to that in 1860. During the intervening years, many theories and practices were introduced, widely adopted and then fell from favour. Despite this, remarkable progress has been made. This chapter takes stock not only of the substantial body of knowledge that has endured, but also of the mistakes made, and blind alleys entered, in the past. The advances made in science and medicine, and the changes in societal attitudes, are put into their historical context. The second purpose of this chapter is to consider where, in the author’s opinion, contemporary epilepsy seems now to be taking wrong turnings and which current concepts are likely to wither like others in the past. Here the spotlight turns also onto the ‘dark side’ of epilepsy, where ideas are not only wrong but detrimental and false. In recent years, terminology has changed and in Eastern cultures the word for epilepsy has changed its form. The question is also debated as to whether reform should be more far-reaching and the term ‘epilepsy’ dropped altogether.