We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter provides a sense of the rupture that characterised the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries by focusing on a series of political, technological and scholarly developments which contributed to creating a widespread atmosphere and experience of fundamental social change. I argue that crowds were seen as embodiments of these broader social transformations. Focusing on Gustave Le Bon’s crowd psychology, I discuss how theorisation on crowds was analytically indebted to late-nineteenth-century debates about hypnotic suggestion as these played out within psychotherapy. I argue that fin-de-siècle discussions of hypnotic suggestion did not simply propose that individuals are completely plastic creatures, always malleable in the hands of a powerful hypnotist. Rather, at the heart of the psychotherapy discussions at this time was the proposition that suggestion need not entail de-individualisation: the mimesis generated through suggestion may well depend on anti-mimetic individuals who must voluntarily let go of themselves in order for the mimetic suggestion to work. I discuss this in terms of tensional individuality.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.