Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 6 - Decision-Making, Governance, and the Distribution of Power: Implications for the Student Experience

  • Scott A. Bass, American University, Washington DC
  • Book:
    Administratively Adrift
    Published online:
    02 June 2022
    Print publication:
    09 June 2022, pp 125-153

  • Summary

    Behind its apparent hierarchical structure, the university is a complex, fragmented organization of semi-autonomous units. Changing it depends on a clear understanding of its history, power dynamics, and processes. Traditions of tenure, shared governance, and academic freedom give faculty unique authority. Professional staff work in a more typical hierarchy in a host of distinct offices. Professional staff providing services directly to students oversee much of their campus life. Atop this decentralized structure, the university president answers to multiple outside constituencies, manages the internal complexity, and often fundraises as well. Theoretical frameworks to understand decision-making in the modern university range from “organized anarchy” to a “loosely coupled federation” to a professional bureaucracy operating through committees, often ad hoc, to address problems. But perhaps the key insight is the politicization of the siloed nature of university operations, which leads to inefficiency, frustration, and in several shameful cases, to abusive treatment of students.