Neurocognitive deficits commonly occur following pediatric stroke and can impact many neuropsychological domains. Despite awareness of these deleterious effects, neurocognitive outcome after pediatric stroke, especially hemorrhagic stroke, is understudied. This clinical study aimed to elucidate the impact of eight factors identified in the scientific literature as possible predictors of neurocognitive outcome following pediatric stroke: age at stroke, stroke type (i.e., ischemic vs. hemorrhagic), lesion size, lesion location (i.e., brain region, structures impacted, and laterality), time since stroke, neurologic severity, seizures post-stroke, and socioeconomic status.

Ninety-two patients, ages six to 25 and with a history of pediatric stroke, chose to participate in the study and were administered standardized neuropsychological tests assessing verbal reasoning, abstract reasoning, working memory, processing speed, attention, learning ability, long-term memory, and visuomotor integration. A standardized parent questionnaire provided an estimate of executive functioning. Statistical analyses included spline regressions to examine the impact of age at stroke and lesion size, further divided by stroke type; a series of one-way analysis of variance to examine differences in variables with three levels; Welch’s t-tests to examine dichotomous variables; and simple linear regressions for continuous variables.

Lesion size, stroke type, age at stroke, and socioeconomic status were identified as predictors of neurocognitive outcome in our sample. Large lesions were associated with worse neurocognitive outcomes compared to small to medium lesions across neurocognitive domains. Exploratory spline regressions suggested that ischemic stroke was associated with worse neurocognitive outcomes than hemorrhagic stroke. Based on patterns shown in graphs, age at stroke appeared to have an impact on outcome depending on the neurocognitive domain and stroke type, with U-shaped trends suggesting worse outcome across most domains when stroke occurred at approximately 5 to 10 years of age. Socioeconomic status positively predicted outcomes across most neurocognitive domains. Participants with seizures had more severe executive functioning impairments than youth without seizures. Youth with combined cortical-subcortical lesions scored lower on abstract reasoning than youth with cortical and youth with subcortical lesions, and lower on attention than youth with cortical lesions. Neurologic severity predicted scores on abstract reasoning, attention, processing speed, and visuomotor integration, depending on stroke type. There was no evidence of differences on outcome measures based on time since stroke, lesion laterality, or lesion region defined as supra-versus infratentorial.

The current study contributed to the scientific literature by identifying lesion size, stroke type, age at stroke, and socioeconomic status as predictors of neurocognitive outcome following pediatric stroke. Future research should examine other possible predictors of neurocognitive outcome that remain unexplored. Multisite collaborations would provide larger sample sizes and allow teams to build models with better statistical power and more predictors. Enhancing understanding of neurocognitive outcomes following pediatric stroke is a first step towards improving appraisals of prognosis.

Findings are clinically applicable as they provide professionals with information that can help assess individual expected patterns of recovery and thus refer patients to appropriate support services.

People with Korsakoff syndrome (KS) experience severe neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric complications following vitamin B1 deficiency predominantly due to alcoholism. KS often presents itself with neuropsychological symptoms such as problems in episodic memory, executive functioning, and social cognition. Common neuropsychiatric symptoms in KS are disorders of affect, confabulations, anosognosia, and apathy. Apathy can be defined by a pathological lack of goal-directed behaviors, goal-directed cognitions, and goal-directed emotions. Patients with KS have an increased risk of cerebrovascular comorbidity. Cerebrovascular accidents are known to increase the risk for developing apathy. Apathy in KS patients can negatively influence the ability to live an autonomous life, often making 24-hour care a necessity. Limited research on apathy in KS patients has been published to this day. Our aim was to assess apathy in Korsakoff patients with and without neurovascular comorbidity.

General apathy and related subconstructs, such as judgment and decision-making skills, emotional blunting, and the intentions to perform pleasurable activities, were studied in fifteen KS patients, fifteen KS patients with additional cerebrovascular comorbidity, and fifteen healthy controls. The first responsible caregiver of each patient filled in the Apathy Evaluation Scale and Scale for Emotional Blunting. An examiner administered the interview-based Judgement scale of the Neuropsychology Assessment Battery with the KS patients and each KS patient filled in the self-report section of the Pleasurable Activities List. Both KS patient groups receive 24-hour care in a specialized facility for Korsakoff Syndrome.

Our study found higher levels of general apathy in both KS patient groups, when rated by their caregiver compared to healthy controls. No difference was found between the KS patient groups and the healthy control group on the self-reported section of the Pleasurable Activities List, which might suggest the presence of intrinsic motivation in KS patients. However, a discrepancy was found between the self-reported activity levels and proxy reported levels of apathy. KS patients with cerebrovascular comorbidity showed increased levels of emotional blunting compared to KS patients without cerebrovascular comorbidity and healthy controls. Decreased judgment and decision-making skills were found in both patient groups compared to healthy controls, with no difference found between KS patients with cerebrovascular comorbidity and KS patients without.

Our findings suggest that people with Korsakoff syndrome experience more general apathy compared to healthy controls. Both patient groups showed decreased judgement and decision-making skills and increased emotional blunting. Intrinsic motivation was found to be intact in KS patients. Experiencing cerebrovascular comorbidity in KS carries a risk for developing emotional blunting. Our findings show that apathy greatly affects people with KS. Future scientific research is warranted to further benefit the care for this complex patient population.