Placing an inertial measurement unit (IMU) at the 5th lumbar vertebra (L5) is a frequently employed method to assess the whole-body center of mass (CoM) motion during walking. However, such a fixed position approach does not account for instantaneous changes in body segment positions that change the CoM. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the congruence between CoM accelerations obtained from these two methods. The CoM positions were calculated based on trajectory data from 49 markers placed on bony landmarks, and its accelerations were computed using the finite-difference algorithm. Concurrently, accelerations were obtained with an IMU placed at L5, a proxy CoM position. Data were collected from 16 participants. Bland–Altman Limits of Agreement and Statistical Parametric Mapping approaches were used to examine the similarity and differences between accelerations directly obtained from the IMU and those derived from position data of the L5 marker (ML5) and whole-body CoM during a gait cycle. The correlation was moderate between IMU and CoM accelerations (r = 0.58) and was strong between IMU and ML5 or between CoM and ML5 accelerations (r = 0.76). There were significant differences in magnitudes between CoM and ML5 and between CoM and IMU accelerations along the anteroposterior and mediolateral directions during the early loading response, mid-stance, and terminal stance to pre-swing. Such comprehensive understanding of the similarity or discrepancy between CoM accelerations acquired by a single IMU and a camera-based motion capture system could further improve the development of wearable sensor technology for human movement analysis.

The energetic cost of walking varies with mass and speed; however, the metabolic cost of carrying loads has not consistently increased proportionally to the mass carried. The cost of carrying mass, and the speed at which human walkers carry this mass, has been shown to vary with load position and load description (e.g. child vs. groceries). Additionally, the preponderance of women carriers around the world, and the tendency for certain kinds of population-level sexual dimorphism has led to the hypothesis that women might be more effective carriers than men. Here, I investigate the energetic cost and speed changes of women (N = 9) and men (N = 6) walking through the woods carrying their own babies (mean baby mass = 10.6 kg) in three different positions – on their front, side and back using the same Ergo fabric baby sling. People carrying their babies on their backs are able to maintain their unloaded walking speed (1.4 m/s) and show the lowest increase in metabolic cost per distance (J/m, 17.4%). Women carry the babies for a lower energetic cost than men at all conditions (p < 0.01). Further energetic and kinematic evidence elucidates the preponderance of back-carrying cross-culturally, and illustrates the importance of relatively wider bi-trochanteric breadths for reducing the energetic costs of carrying.

Steep slope vineyards are a complex scenario for the development of ground robots. Planning a safe robot trajectory is one of the biggest challenges in this scenario, characterized by irregular surfaces and strong slopes (more than 35°). Moving the robot through a pile of stones, spots with high slope or/and with wrong robot yaw may result in an abrupt fall of the robot, damaging the equipment and centenary vines, and sometimes imposing injuries to humans. This paper presents a novel approach for path planning aware of center of mass of the robot for application in sloppy terrains. Agricultural robotic path planning (AgRobPP) is a framework that considers the A* algorithm by expanding inner functions to deal with three main inputs: multi-layer occupation grid map, altitude map and robot’s center of mass. This multi-layer grid map is updated by obstacles taking into account the terrain slope and maximum robot posture. AgRobPP is also extended with algorithms for local trajectory replanning during the execution of a trajectory that is blocked by the presence of an obstacle, always assuring the safety of the re-planned path. AgRobPP has a novel PointCloud translator algorithm called PointCloud to grid map and digital elevation model (PC2GD), which extracts the occupation grid map and digital elevation model from a PointCloud. This can be used in AgRobPP core algorithms and farm management intelligent systems as well. AgRobPP algorithms demonstrate a great performance with the real data acquired from AgRob V16, a robotic platform developed for autonomous navigation in steep slope vineyards.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) has been reported to affect the performance of ambulation, including unobstructed and obstructed gait. An increased risk of falling in patients with knee OA during obstaclecrossing, as opposed to unobstructed level walking, may be explained by the difference in the control of the body's center of mass (COM) with respect to the center of pressure (COP) while trying to ensure sufficient foot clearance. The purpose of the study was to investigate the dynamic stability in patients with knee OA during level walking and obstacle-crossing. The COM-COP inclination angles and angular velocities, as well as temporal-spatial variables, from eleven patients with bilateral knee OA and eleven normal controls were obtained during level walking and obstacle-crossing using a three-dimensional motion analysis system and forceplates. Demands in the control of the COM relative to the COP were found to be greater during obstacle-crossing in both subject groups. While less stable COM control was found around the end stage of double stance phase during obstacle-crossing when compared to level walking, patients with knee OA successfully acquired strategies in the sagittal plane to maintain close-tonormal stable COM control with normal toe clearances during both level walking and obstacle-crossing. They achieved stable transitions from single limb stance (SLS) to double limb stance (DLS) through a reduced anterior inclination angle and from DLS to SLS through increased anterior angular velocity. It is suggested that assessment of the ability to control dynamic stability in patients with knee OA should consider both the positions and velocities of the COM and COP.

Fifteen young and fifteen older healthy adults walked and crossed obstacles of three different heights while kinematic data and ground reaction forces were acquired to calculate the three-dimensional motion of the centre of mass (COM) and lower limb joint moments. The older group had greater normalized jerk score of the COM. When the leading limb was crossing, the older group kept the COM more posterior and on the trailing stance limb for longer with increased knee extensor crossing moments and thus decreased anterioposterior COM deceleration. When the trailing limb was crossing, the older group decreased vertical COM deceleration through increased hip extensor crossing moments. The older group maintained the same COM motion as the young in the frontal plane with greater hip and knee abductor crossing moments. The older group exhibited significant kinetic changes in their locomotor system with increased muscular demand, leading to a more jerky motion of the body COM. However, these changes helped to maintain the frontal COM motion and to achieve a sagittal COM motion pattern which is thought to be helpful for a safe and successful obstacle-crossing. Failure to meet the kinetic demands in the elderly may increase the risk of falls during obstacle-crossing.