We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter considers the popularity of the genre of the short story in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It explores, in particular, a class of magazine stories for which the terms of approval followed the lines of reading for amusement and entertainment. Surveying critical accounts of the short story, and the burgeoning interest in anthologies and handbooks for aspiring writers, the chapter considers what follows if we not only accept but accentuate the notion of the genre as an artistic commodity in a gendered marketplace defined by overabundance. Special consideration is given to the subgenre of “storiettes” published alongside a column covering “the latest fads” in Munsey’s magazine. The essay argues that the style of the period’s short story developed in tandem with ideas about it as a fashionable and consumable commodity, and even as something of a fad.
The rise of modern carnival in Rio de Janeiro, over the early twentieth century, provided an outlet for defusing the enormous social and cultural tensions of the modernizing metropolis. The so-called Great Societies of carnival, which have been little researched, functioned as zones of contact between popular culture and fine art practitioners, some of whom developed pioneering careers as carnival scenographers (carnavalescos). Contrary to received wisdom, exchanges and encounters between the worlds of art and carnival were numerous and varied. The 1913 Salon of the National School of Fine Arts marks a watershed moment, in which the restricted milieu of fine art openly embraced the urban culture of carnival, particularly in the work of painters Rodolpho Chambelland and Arthur Timotheo da Costa. These and other artists laid the groundwork for challenges to the prevailing institutional order, especially after 1916. Even earlier, over the early 1900s, a rebellious milieu of artistic bohemianism, revolving around painter Helios Seelinger, graphic artists Raul and K. Lixto, among others, sought to modernize artistic production in Rio by forging connections with music, dance, theatre, performance and carnival. Previously overlooked, their combined efforts represent an early modernizing current attuned to the adversarial attitudes of German Secessionism, from which they drew inspiration.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.