Estrus synchronization is important for optimal management of gilt reproduction in pig farms. Hormonal treatments, such as synthetic progestogens, are used on a routine basis, but there is a growing demand for non-hormonal alternative breeding tools. Before puberty, gilts exhibit a ‘waiting period,’ related to the ovarian development and gonadotrophin secretions, during which external stimulations, such as boar exposure, could induce and synchronize first ovulation. Practical non-invasive tools for identification of this period in farms are lacking. During this period, urinary oestrone levels are high, but urine sampling is difficult in group-housed females. The aim of this work was to search for specific biomarkers of the ‘waiting period’ in saliva and urine. In total, nine 144- to 147-day-old Large White gilts were subjected to trans-abdominal ultrasonography three times a week for 5 weeks until puberty detection (week –5 to week –1 before puberty). Urine and saliva samples were collected for oestrone assay to detect the ‘waiting period’ and for metabolome analysis using 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to detect potential biomarkers of the ‘waiting period.’ Gilts were slaughtered 7 days after puberty detection for puberty confirmation. Results were consistent with ultrasonography data for six gilts. Urine and saliva samples from these six gilts were analyzed. Urinary estrone concentration significantly increased 2 weeks before puberty detection. Metabolome analysis of urine samples allowed the identification of 78 spectral bins, among them, 42 low-molecular-weight metabolites were identified. Metabolome analysis of salivary samples allowed the identification of 59 spectral bins, among them, 23 low-molecular-weight metabolites were detected and 17 were identified. No potential biomarker was identified in urinary samples. In saliva, butyrate and 2HOvalerate, 5.79 ppm (putatively uridine), formate, malonate and propionate could be biomarker candidates to ascertain the pre-puberty period in gilt reproduction. These results confirm that non-invasive salivary samples could allow the identification of the physiological status of the gilts and presumably the optimal time for application of the boar effect. This could contribute to synchronize puberty onset and hence to develop non-hormonal breeding tools.

One of the more promising techniques for the improvement of sow productivity has been the use of partial weaning or the separation of the sow and litter for periods of between 3 to 12 h/day towards the end of lactation. The purpose of the present study was to examine changes in steroid hormone concentrations, oestrus and fertility responses in lactating sows subjected to altered sucking, boar exposure and gonadotropins in mid lactation and at weaning. Thirty-two crossbred sows were allocated at random to one of four experimental treatments. Treatment 1 sows (no. = 8) were separated from their respective litters for 3 h/day from 12 days post partum through until weaning which was carried out at 21 days post partum. Treatment 1 sows were also given in-pen boar exposure for 1 h/day between day 12 post partum and weaning. Treatment 2 sows (no. = 8) were given the same protocol of litter separation (LS) and boar exposure (BE) as in treatment 1 and they were also given a combination of gonadotropins (Gn) on day 17 of lactation. Treatment 3 sows (no. = 8) were given LS + BE as above and the sows were injected with Gn on the day of weaning. Treatment 4 sows were controls given no LS, BE or Gn (no. = 8). During lactation, treatment 1 sows exhibited significantly (P < 0·05) reduced progesterone concentrations compared with treatment 2 sows. There were no other significant effects of treatment for any of the periods considered. The separation of sows from their piglets with or without gonadotropic treatment did not result in lactational oestrus in any treated sows. No significant treatment differences were found in the subsequent litter size (piglets born alive or total number of piglets). In conclusion, the present results have demonstrated no significant effects of LS, BE and Gn treatment during lactation on sow and litter performance. This was associated with low levels of peripheral plasma progesterone in all lactating sows.