Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder commonly associated with relative impairments on processing speed, working memory, and/or executive functioning. Anxiety commonly co-occurs with ADHD and may also adversely affect these cognitive functions. Additionally, language status (i.e., monolingualism vs bilingualism) has been shown to affect select cognitive domains across an individual’s lifespan. Yet, few studies have examined the potential effects of the interaction between anxiety and language status on various cognitive domains among people with ADHD. Thus, the current study investigated the effects of the interaction of anxiety and language status on processing speed, working memory, and executive functioning among monolingual and bilingual individuals with ADHD.

The sample comprised of 407 consecutive adult patients diagnosed with ADHD. When asked about their language status, 67% reported to be monolingual (English). The Mean age of individuals was 27.93 (SD = 6.83), mean education of 15.8 years (SD = 2.10), 60% female, racially diverse with 49% Non-Hispanic White, 22% Non-Hispanic Black, 13% Hispanic/Latinx, 9% Asian/Pacific Islander, and 6% other race/ethnicity. Processing speed, working memory, and executive function were measured via the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition Processing Speed Index, Working Memory Index, and Trail Making Test B, respectively. Anxiety was measured via the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Three separate linear regression models examined the interaction between anxiety (moderator) and cognition (processing speed, working memory, and executive function) on language. Models included sex/gender and education as covariates with Processing Speed Index and Working Memory Index as the outcomes. Age, sex/gender, and education were used as covariates when Trail Making Test B was the outcome.

Monolingual and bilingual patients differed in mean age (p < .05) but did not differ in level of anxiety, education, or sex/gender. Overall, anxiety was not associated with processing speed, working memory, and executive function. However, the interaction between anxiety and language status was significantly associated with processing speed (ß = -0.37, p < .05), and executive functioning (ß = 0.82, p < .05). No associations were found when anxiety was added as a moderator for the associations between language and working memory.

This study found that anxiety moderated the relationship between language status and select cognitive domains (i.e., processing speed and executive functioning) among individuals with ADHD. Specifically, anxiety had a greater association on processing speed and executive functioning performance for bilinguals rather than monolinguals. Future detailed studies are needed to better understand how anxiety modifies the relationship between language and cognitive performance outcomes over time amongst a linguistically diverse sample.

Word finding or “naming” difficulty is a symptom of multiple neurological disorders; therefore, naming assessment is an integral component of neuropsychological evaluation. Prior work has found weaker second-language naming in healthy proficient bilingual youth than monolingual youth, and similar findings have been shown in adults with epilepsy. Considering the potential influences of both early onset epilepsy and bilingualism on brain development, we compared naming in English second language (ESL) and monolingual youth with epilepsy. To assess the impact of bilingualism independent of the known effects of seizure laterality (i.e., poor naming in those with left, dominant-hemisphere seizures), we excluded patients with left language dominance and unilateral seizures. We hypothesized that like other groups, naming would be weaker in ESL than in monolingual youth with epilepsy.

Participants included 84 children with seizures that could not be lateralized clinically (n=36), bilateral seizures (n=20), centrotemporal spikes (n=3), and those with unilateral seizures and atypical language dominance (n=25), ages 6-15 years old: 66 monolingual, English (mean age: 10.87 ± 2.70 years) and 18 ESL (mean age: 10.78 ± 2.88 years). Those with FSIQ < 70 and vocabulary SS < 6 were excluded to ensure English proficiency. Independent samples t-tests, multivariate ANOVA, and chi-square tests compared groups on demographic factors and test performance. All measures (FSIQ, WISC/WASI Vocabulary, letter and category fluency, Children’s Auditory (AN) and Visual Naming (VN) Tests) were administered in English.

Monolingual and ESL groups did not differ in: age, sex, SES, seizure type (i.e., non-lateralized, bilateral, centrotemporal spikes, or atypical language dominance), epilepsy onset age, or number of AEDs. Comparisons also showed no differences in FSIQ, vocabulary, letter fluency, or category fluency (all ps > 0.05). By contrast, auditory and visual naming performances were weaker among ESL patients than monolingual patients: AN accuracy, F(1,81) = 10.89, p = 0.001; AN tip-of-the-tongues (TOTs), F(1,81) = 6.35, p = 0.014; AN Summary Scores (SS), F(1,81) = 6.17, p = 0.015; VN accuracy, F(1,81) = 4.66, p = 0.034; VN SS, F(1,81) = 4.87, p = 0.030, with the exception of VN TOTs, which approached significance, F(1,81) = 3.55, p = 0.063.

Consistent with findings in bilingual healthy youth and ESL adults with epilepsy, naming in ESL youth with epilepsy was weaker than in monolingual children. The groups did not differ on other aspects of language. Thus, unlike other expressive verbal functions, naming is adversely affected in the second language of bilingual people with epilepsy across the age span. These results suggest that poor naming in ESL patients cannot be used to infer a naming deficit, and/or left (dominant) temporal lobe dysfunction.

In the US, >20% of individuals aged 5 years and older speak a language other than English at home, with rates of bi- and multilingualism increasing. Providing linguistically- and culturally- competent care to increasingly diverse populations is a necessary task for neuropsychologists. The need for close attention to bilingualism is even more glaring in the context of neurosurgical interventions, such as in intractable epilepsy. Pre-surgical epilepsy evaluations serve as a baseline for post-surgical change, inform lateralization and localization, and help determine cognitive risks associated with surgery. The importance of evaluating bilingual status and assessing cognitive abilities in both languages, if needed, in presurgical epilepsy evaluations is examined. We present the neuropsychological profile of a 10-year-old bilingual male with intractable epilepsy participating in a pre-surgical epilepsy evaluation.

This right-handed male is a sequential language learner, exposed to Spanish at birth and English when he began kindergarten. His parent reported he was primarily English speaking. Developmental milestones were met within expected timeframes. Seizures began at age 5. He is prescribed Vimpat and Lamictal. vEEG during admission revealed right temporal-onset seizures. Neuropsychological assessment was conducted in English based on parent report; however, expressive language testing revealed significantly higher performance in Spanish (average) compared to English (exceptionally low). Subsequently, a bilingual provider was consulted, and supplemental Spanish verbal reasoning and verbal memory measures were administered.

The patient’s neuropsychological profile captured a significant difference between English and Spanish verbal abilities. WISC-V Similarities scaled scores (ss) were 5 and 11 in English and Spanish, respectively. Vocabulary scaled scores were 8 and 15 in English and Spanish, respectively. Regarding verbal memory, list learning was below average in English (ss = 5), but low average in Spanish (ss = 6). Contextual verbal memory was only administered in Spanish; scores were average (ss = 10). Verbal Fluency administered in English was low (phonemic fluency ss = 5, categorical fluency ss = 6). fMRI verbal tasks were performed in English and revealed left-sided language lateralization.

In pre-surgical epilepsy evaluations of bilingual children, consideration of language is essential. Assessment of language dominance is a minimum requirement in bilingual families, followed by full bilingual evaluation if necessary. In this case, starkly different conclusions regarding lateralization and localization may have been made if the child had not been evaluated in both languages. In English, a significant split between verbal and non-verbal cognition was apparent, possibly suggesting involvement of the dominant left hemisphere. With Spanish testing, this split disappeared, with high average verbal skills. While a growing proportion of children in the US are bilingual, bilingual assessments are not commonly conducted in pre-surgical epilepsy evaluations. In fact, very little work has been done examining language functioning in bilingual epilepsy patients, particularly in children. With both epilepsy-and language-related factors at play in a developing brain, we encourage closer attention to these issues, particularly in the context of neurosurgical procedures.

Concerns that exposure to more than one language in the home might negatively impact language development in young children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are common among caregivers. Although research directly examining the impact of a multilingual home environment in ASD is scarce, emerging evidence shows that language outcomes might be equivalent or better in children with ASD exposed to more than one language (Romero & Uddin, 2021). However, no evidence to date exists on whether exposure to more than one language affects early brain functional development in children with ASD. The current study aims to examine the (1) cross-sectional and (2) longitudinal associations between home language environment (exposure to one v. multiple languages at home, H1l vs. H>1l) and receptive and expressive language skills in young children with and without ASD, and (3) to investigate links between home language environment and brain functional network organization.

Participants included young children with ASD (n=67, mean age: 35±13 months, H>1l n=43) and typically developing (TD) children (n=39, mean age: 32±16 months, H>1l n=17) enrolled in a longitudinal study of early brain markers of autism. A subset of children with ASD for whom longitudinal behavioral data from two study visits were available (n=21, H>1l n=11) were used for exploratory analysis. Receptive language (RL) and expressive language (EL) skills were assessed by the Mullen Scales of Early Learning at each study visit. Data from 42 children with ASD (H>1l n=27) and 38 TD children (H>1l n= 15) for whom functional MRI data were acquired during natural sleep were included in functional connectivity (FC) analysis. ANCOVAs were employed to examine the effect of diagnosis, home language environment (H1l vs. H>1l) and its interaction on RL and EL skills while controlling for socioeconomic variables (i.e., maternal education level, income-to-needs ratio) and gestational age at birth. Linear mixed models were applied to explore the longitudinal effect of home language environment on RL and EL skills across two study visits in the ASD group. Lastly, FC analysis was conducted to compare functional connectivity across 7 canonical brain networks in children with and without ASD who were raised in H1l and H>1l.

We found significant diagnosis by home language environment interaction effect on EL skills, with children with ASD and H1l exhibiting the lowest EL skills. Longitudinal analysis identified a significant home language environment by study visit interaction effect on EL skills in children with ASD. Specifically, children with ASD and H1l showed lower EL skills at study visit 1 but equivalent EL skills at study visit 2 compared to children with ASD and H>1l. FC analysis revealed that children with ASD and H>1l displayed more typical brain network organization (similar to TD children) compared to those with H1l, specifically for FC between language, frontoparietal, and default mode networks.

These results suggest that early exposure to more than one language in the home may be linked with better expressive language skills in young children with ASD. Results of functional connectivity analysis also suggest that exposure to more than one language may be associated with more neurotypical functional network organization, particularly involving language and high-order networks.

Previous studies have found differences between monolingual and bilingual athletes on ImPACT, the most widely used sport-related concussion (SRC) assessment measure. Most recently, results suggest that monolingual English-Speaking athletes outperformed bilingual English- and Spanish-speaking athletes on Visual Motor Speed and Reaction Time composites. Before further investigation of these differences can occur, measurement invariance of ImPACT must be established to ensure that differences are not attributable to measurement error. The current study aimed to 1) replicate a recently identified four-factor model using cognitive subtest scores of ImPACT on baseline assessments in monolingual English-Speaking athletes and bilingual English- and Spanish-speaking athletes and 2) to establish measurement invariance across groups.

Participants included high school athletes who were administered the ImPACT as part of their standard pre-season athletic training protocol in English. Participants were excluded if they had a self-reported history of concussion, Autism, ADHD, learning disability or treatment history of epilepsy/seizures, brain surgery, meningitis, psychiatric disorders, or substance/alcohol use. The final sample included 7,948 monolingual English-speaking athletes and 7,938 bilingual English- and Spanish-speaking athletes with valid baseline assessments. Language variables were based on self-report. As the number of monolingual athletes was substantially larger than the number of bilingual athletes, monolingual athletes were randomly selected from a larger sample to match the bilingual athletes on age, sex, and sport. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test competing models, including one-factor, two-factor, and three-factor models to determine if a recently identified four-factor model (Visual Memory, Visual Reaction Time, Verbal Memory, Working Memory) provided the best fit of the data. Eighteen subtest scores from ImPACT were used in the CFAs. Through increasingly restrictive multigroup CFAs (MGCFA), configural, metric, scalar, and residual levels of invariance were assessed by language group.

CFA indicated that the four-factor model provided the best fit in the monolingual and bilingual samples compared to competing models. However, some goodness-of-fit-statistics were below recommended cutoffs, and thus, post-hoc model modifications were made on a theoretical basis and by examination of modification indices. The modified four-factor model had adequate to superior fit and met criteria for all goodness-of-fit indices and was retained as the configural model to test measurement invariance across language groups. MGCFA revealed that residual invariance, the strictest level of invariance, was achieved across groups.

This study provides support for a modified four-factor model as estimating the latent structure of ImPACT cognitive scores in monolingual English-speaking and bilingual English- and Spanish-speaking high school athletes at baseline assessment. Results further suggest that differences between monolingual English-speaking and bilingual English- and Spanish-speaking athletes reported in prior ImPACT studies are not caused by measurement error. The reason for these differences remains unclear but are consistent with other studies suggesting monolingual advantages. Given the increase in bilingual individuals in the United States, and among high school athletics, future research should investigate other sources of error such as item bias and predictive validity to further understand if group differences reflect real differences between these athletes.

Neuropsychological evaluations are used to examine a person’s current cognitive functioning. Performance validity tests (PVT) are included in neuropsychological test batteries to ensure that examinees are performing to the best of their abilities and identify non-credible performance. There are two types of PVTs: freestanding and embedded. A freestanding PVT is a cognitive test created to evaluate performance validity and do not measure any type of cognition directly. Meanwhile, an embedded PVT is a task design to evaluate some sort of cognition (e.g., memory) by using traditional neuropsychological tests (e.g., Trail Making Test) and performance validity. Research suggests that undergraduate college students are not always performing to the best of their abilities when completing a comprehensive neuropsychological battery. In fact, in one study where an undergraduate college sample was given three PVTs, it was reported that 56% of the participants failed at least one PVT in their first session and 31% in their second session. Research has also shown that speaking multiple languages can influence cognition. The purpose of this study was to identify in three credible language groups of college students what PVTs does bilingualism influence higher failure rates. It was predicted that bilingual college students would significantly demonstrate higher PVTs failure rates compared to monolingual college students.

The sample consisted of 70 English first language monolinguals (EFLM), 33 English first language bilinguals (EFLB), and 68 English second language bilinguals (ESLB) that were psychologically and neurologically healthy. All participants completed a comprehensive neuropsychological battery in English. The Rey-Osterrith complex figure copy test, Comalli Stroop part A, B, and C, Trail Making Test part A and B, Symbol Digit Modalities Test written and oral parts, Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) letter fluency, and Finger Tapping Test were the tasks used as embedded PVTs to evaluate failure rates in our sample. Moreover, all participants were credible (i.e., they did not fail two or more PVTs). PVT cutoff scores were selected for each embedded PVT from previous literature. Chi-square analysis were used to evaluate failure rates between language groups on each PVT.

We found no significant failure rate differences between language groups on any of the PVTs. However, while no significant group differences were found, on the COWAT letter fluency results revealed higher failure rates between the three language groups (i.e., 13% EFLM, 24% EFLB, and 22% ESLB) compared to other PVTs.

Our data suggested no significant failure rate differences between language groups. It has been suggested in previous studies that linguistic factors impact PVT performance and test interpretation. On the COWAT letter fluency task, it is possible that language is driving higher failure rates between bilingual speakers, even though we found no significant failure rates or performance differences between the three language groups. Future studies should examine language groups and other cultural variables (e.g., time perspective) to determine what may be driving high failure rates on the COWAT letter fluency task in credible participants.

Bilingualism has shown to have significant implications for neuropsychological assessment, namely, the Digit Span task. Moreover, bilingual individuals have been shown to exhibit both advantages and disadvantages on Digit Span; however, the relationship between bilingualism and performance on this subtest is poorly understood. This research aims to better understand how Hispanic Spanish-English bilinguals perform on this commonly administered working memory subtest.

Participants included 82 Hispanic Spanish-English bilinguals [Age: M=29.11 (SD=6.369); Education: M=15.68 (SD=2.255); 53.7% female]. The participants completed the Language and Social Background Questionnaire (LSBQ; composite factor scores) and the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale -Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) Digit Span (raw scores) subtest via Zoom, an online video conferencing platform. A hierarchical multiple regression analysis was utilized to predict participants’ Digit Span performance based on their LSBQ composite factor scores. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses were conducted using SPSS Version 27.

LSBQ composite factor scores significantly predicted Digit Span Forward, F (3, 78) = 1.835, p < 0.43 (R2 = .030) and Longest Digit Span Forward, F (1, 78) = 4.02, p < 0.48 (R2 = .041) scores. LSBQ composite factor scores did not significantly predict Digit Span Backward, F (3, 78) = .344, p = .941, Digit Span Sequencing, F (3, 78) = .598, p = .731, Digit Span Total, F (3, 78) = .440, p = 0.296, Longest Digit Span Backward, F (3, 78) = .510, p = .666, or Longest Digit Span sequencing F (3, 78) = .200, p = .751 scores.

Results suggest that Hispanic Spanish-English bilinguals perform worse on Digit Span Forward and Longest Digit Span Forward as their bilingual experiences increase. However, bilingual experiences did not significantly predict Digit Span Backward, Digit Span Sequencing, Digit Span Total, Longest Digit Span Backward, or Longest Digit Span Sequencing scores. The contrasts in Digit Span performance may be attributed to the different ways in which each condition of the subtest is cognitively processed. Therefore, clinicians and researchers should use caution when interpreting test data for Digit Span with Hispanic Spanish-English bilinguals.

The research examining the influence of bilingualism on cognition continues to grow. Past research shows that monolingual speakers outperformed bilingual speakers on language, memory, and attention and processing speed tasks. However, the opposite has been found favoring bilingual speakers, when comparing executive functioning abilities. Furthermore, researchers have reported that no differences in executive functioning abilities exist between young adult monolingual speakers compared to young adult bilingual speakers. Moreover, limited research exists examining cognition abilities between monolinguals, bilinguals that learn a language (e.g., English) first, and bilinguals that learn the same language (e.g., English) second. We examined young adult monolinguals cognition abilities (e.g., memory) compared to young adult bilinguals that learned English as a first or second language. It was expected that the monolingual group would outperform both bilingual groups on memory, language, and attention and processing tasks, but no differences would be found on executive functioning tasks.

The sample consisted of 149 right-handed undergraduate students with a mean age of 19.58 (SD = 1.90). Participants were neurologically and psychologically healthy and divided into three language groups: English first language (EFL) monolingual speakers, EFL bilingual speakers, and English second language (ESL) bilingual speakers. All the participants completed a background questionnaire and comprehensive neuropsychological battery that included memory, language, executive functioning, and attention and processing speed tasks in English. A series of ANOVA’s were used to evaluate cognitive tasks (e.g., Boston Naming Test, Trail Making Test) between the language groups. Participants demonstrated adequate effort on one performance validity test.

Language groups were well demographically matched. We found the EFL monolingual group outperformed the ESL bilingual group on the Wide Range Achievement Test, fourth edition task and the Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) phonemic task, p’s < .05, np’s2 = .04-.05. Additionally, results revealed both monolingual groups outperformed the ESL bilingual group on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Third edition vocabulary task and the Boston Naming Test, p’s < .05, np’s2 = .06-.15. No significant differences were found on any of the cognitive tasks between the EFL monolingual group and the EFL bilingual group.

As expected, the ESL bilingual group performed worse on language tasks compared to both monolingual groups, specifically the EFL monolingual group. However, in the opposite direction, we found the EFL monolingual demonstrated better phonemic verbal fluency abilities on the COWAT compared to the ESL bilingual group. The current data suggest that bilingualism influences cognitive abilities (e.g., language, executive functioning) more ESL bilingual speakers compared to EFL monolingual speakers. A possible explanation may be due to the type of interaction that ESL bilingual speakers may prefer to have (i.e., mix language conversations) compared to EFL speaking groups. Future studies with a larger bilingual speaking sample should investigate if the Adaptive Control Hypothesis which suggest that different types of conversations may be placing different demands of language control influences cognitive abilities.

Spontaneous speech undergoes subtle but significant changes years before the onset of Alzheimer's dementia (AD). In monolinguals, these changes, or linguistic markers of AD, include the use of syntactically simpler structures, reduced lexical diversity, reduced semantic detail/specificity, and increased disfluencies (Ostrand & Gunstad, 2020; Slegers et al., 2018; Venneri et al., 2018). No studies have examined if bilinguals exhibit similar changes in their language output prior to diagnosis of AD though this question has important clinical relevance and can also shed light on which cognitive abilities decline first with AD pathology. Of particular interest, changes in semantic representations might affect both languages (because semantics are shared between the two), but changes in executive control might be more prominent in the nondominant language (because of interference from the dominant language).

Seventeen older Spanish-English bilinguals completed an interview in which they described a picture in each language and answered a series of questions beginning with "warm-up" questions and progressing to questions that elicited higher level language (e.g., defending an opinion). All participants were considered cognitively healthy at the time of testing, but 8 participants later developed Alzheimer's Disease (i.e., converters) on average after 4.1 (SD=2.5) years, while 9 matched controls remained cognitively healthy on average for 5.7 (SD=3.6) years (for as long as they were followed). Converters and controls were matched for age, education, language proficiency, and cognitive status at the time of testing. Language samples were transcribed word for word and analyzed using the Systematic Analysis of Language (Miller & Iglesias, 2012).

Converters and controls were compared on measures of syntactic complexity, lexical diversity, abandoned utterances, errors, and disfluencies. In the dominant language, the number of different words (using a moving window average; a measure of lexical diversity), showed promise for classifying who would eventually convert (Area Under the Curve = 77), though the difference between converters and controls was significant only in a 1-tailed test (t(15)=-1.96, p=.034). In the nondominant language, converters showed a higher percent of Maze words compared to controls (2-tailed t (15) = 2.27, p = 0.039). Mazes combine repetitions, filled pauses, and revisions. Further exploration of Maze subcomponents revealed that filled pauses and revisions produced no differences between groups in either language (all ps3.18), but converters produced more repetitions (e.g., "the the boy" or "the cou-counter") than controls, (2-tailed t-tests in both languages were significant; ps <.03). However, variability in repetitions was high, making it less sensitive in the ROC analysis.

Changes in bilinguals' spoken language output occur years before diagnosis, in agreement with literature on monolinguals. However, in bilinguals, the two languages may be differentially affected by cognitive changes. The dominant language may be more sensitive for discriminating groups possibly reflecting semantic decline and decreased ability to quickly access a variety of words. But changes in the nondominant language reveal a broader nature of cognitive deficits in prodromal AD, including decreased circumlocution abilities to avoid disfluencies when faced with word-finding difficulties.

In the wake of the national controversy over demographically corrected normative comparisons used in neuropsychological assessment, the field finds itself in need of adopting better practices and providing stronger instruction in norm selection and application when assessing underrepresented populations. Neuropsychologists must employ critical thinking within their clinical decision-making that takes into account patient demographics, analysis of the measures themselves, normative samples, and statistical adjustments employed in normative studies. Not doing so may result in erroneous diagnostic conclusions, exposing underserved patient populations to poor or harmful clinical care and even misdiagnosis. The following case series presents several demographic considerations illustrating how selection and application of different (at times, ill-fitting) normative reference groups can affect treatment outcomes in the Latinx community. We examined the performance of various published norms when applied to monolingual and bilingual Spanish speakers.

This study samples three demographically diverse (i.e., education, age, and sex) clinical cases and applies regression-based and stratified norms to raw scores to demonstrate the possible differential outcomes when using different reference groups. One example is Ms. Congeniality, a 69-year-old, Spanish and English bilingual woman with 12 years of education who presented for a third revaluation at our clinic due to progressive memory loss. Her prior Spanish language profiles demonstrated impaired confrontation naming and steadily decreasing letter fluency over the past 10 years.

Her performance on semantic fluency (i.e., animal naming) showed relative stability based on her raw scores (10 in 2012, 11 in 2016, and 12 in 2022). Using the Neuropsi A&M norms, which stratify performance across nine age ranges between ages 6-85 and three education ranges between 0-10+ years, her performance over the past 10 years ranged between the less than 1st percentile to the 9th percentile (1%, 1%, and 9%, respectively). However, using the NP-NUMBRS norms, which use regression-based continuous age (19-60) and education (0-20) predictors of test performance, her scores corresponded to steadily improved performance (8%, 28%, and 86%). Thus, this qualitative comparison demonstrates a likely overcorrection for individuals of advanced age when using norms based on samples that are a poor fit because they lack representation of older adults, as in NP-NUMBRS, and a possible undercorrection when using norms with overly broad education stratifications (e.g., 10-22 years, as in Neuropsi).

Application of ill-fitting normative standards can have far-reaching implications for interpretation of neuropsychological test results. Moreover, this case series exemplifies the need for higher-order instruction in norm selection, specifically for underserved communities who run the risk of being misdiagnosed. Through case examples, this study underscores the importance of understanding the unique effects of different demographic corrections in the context of limited available normative reference groups. This abstract is the first illustration in a series of papers aimed at facilitating the decision-making process within the framework of socially responsible neuropsychological practice.

Several studies have found a bilingualism advantage on executive functioning tasks like cognitive flexibility, inhibitory control, switching, and working memory in typically developing populations. (Grote et al., 2015, Foy & Mann, 2014). However, some studies have found deficits in inhibitory control and switching for bilingual individuals with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) compared to monolingual individuals and control groups (Bialystok et al., 2017, Mor et al., 2015). They suggest that this disadvantage is due to the burden of managing two language systems which perpetuates the executive dysfunction seen in ADHD. The current study aims to examine if there is a bilingualism advantage in other aspects of executive function, including inhibitory control, planning, problem solving, switching, and working memory among children and adults diagnosed with ADHD.

The medical records of 170 patients evaluated in an outpatient neuropsychology clinic from 20182022 were reviewed. Sixty participants diagnosed with ADHD, between the ages of 6 and 46 (61.67% male), comprised the final sample. Forty-one were monolingual and 19 were bilingual or multilingual. Language status was based upon patient or parental report. Outcomes on various direct and indirect measures of executive function were examined.

Linear regression models, adjusting for age and sex, revealed a significant bilingual advantage on the following measures: Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children- Fifth Edition (WISC-V) and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) Digit Span Backwards and Digit Span Sequencing, WISC-V Picture Span, and Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, 2nd Edition (BRIEF-2) Parent-Report Emotion Regulation Index (ERI). There were no significant differences in scores between monolinguals and bilinguals on the following measures: Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) Color-Word Interference Inhibition versus Combined Naming Contrast Score and Inhibition/Switching versus Inhibition Contrast Score, D-KEFS Trail Making Number-Letter Switching versus Combined Number Sequencing and Letter Sequencing Contrast Score, A Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment, 2nd Edition (NEPSY-2) Naming versus Inhibition Contrast Score and Switching versus Inhibition Contrast Score, Wisconsin Card Sort Task Learning to Learn Index, BRIEF-2 Parent-rated Behavioral Regulation Index (BRI), Cognitive Regulation Index(CRI), and Global Executive Composite(GEC), BRIEF-2 Self-rated BRI, ERI, CRI, and GEC, or BRIEF Adult Version BRI, Metacognitive Index, and GEC.

Bilingual status is associated with stronger auditory and visual working memory among people with ADHD, but not with stronger inhibitory control, switching, planning, or problem solving skills. At the same time, there were no significant differences between monolingual and bilingual ADHD patients on BRIEF parent- or self-rated behavioral or cognitive dysregulation. Our results suggest that bilingualism may confer an advantage in some aspects of executive function among a population with weak attention and executive function skills more broadly. Furthermore, we did not find any type of disadvantage for those who are bilingual. Future studies should examine whether lower parental ratings of emotion dysregulation among ADHD patients who are bilingual are due to bilingual children’s better ability to adapt to different situations or cultural differences in parenting practices.

Code-switching is when bilingual individuals alternate between two languages in the same conversation. Some studies find that code-switching frequency is associated with executive functioning, while others do not. Individual attitudes towards bilingual language use and code-switching may explain the inconsistency in the literature. For instance, greater positive attitudes towards code-switching may be associated with more likelihood to engage in that practice and thus strengthen the cognitive benefit in executive function. Additionally, code-switching between English and Spanish has been stigmatized in the U.S., therefore it is unclear what sociocultural factors may predict positive attitudes. In this study, we assessed Latinx bilinguals’ attitudes on code-switching and investigated their relationship with code-switching frequency, sociodemographic and linguistic factors, and executive functioning.

Participants were 525 community-dwelling English-Spanish bilingual Latinx adults from the Offspring study (Mage= 55.38 (10.42); Meducation= 12.62 (3.34); 71% women; 41% tested in English, 75% immigrant). A language history questionnaire assessed for bilingualism and code-switching frequency. Participants completed 7 questions on code-switching attitudes on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree (e.g., “switching between languages in a conversation is an important part of my identity”), that were summed for a total score with higher scores indicating more positive attitudes. Executive functioning was assessed with the NIH Toolbox Cognition battery, verbal fluencies, and the digit span test. Sociodemographic and linguistic factors included age, sex, education, immigrant status, parental years of education, English and Spanish proficiency (average score on self-reported ratings on speaking, reading, writing, and understanding), and testing language. General linear models evaluated the association of code-switching attitudes on executive function, after adjusting for relevant covariates.

Positive code-switching attitudes were correlated with greater code-switching, r(499)=.33, p<.001. Younger age r(499)=-.11, being born in the US t(493)=-2.05, greater English proficiency r(497)=.15, and English dominance t(499)=2.22, were associated with more positive code-switching attitudes (all p’s <.05). Sex, education, parental years of education, and Spanish proficiency were not associated with code-switching attitudes. Overall models of attitudes with executive function indicated that positive code-switching attitudes were associated with worse visual working memory (b = -0.08, t(169) = -2.75, 95% CI [0.14, -0.02]) after adjusting for age, sex, education, immigration status, parental years of education and testing language. Code-switching attitudes were not significantly associated with other executive function measures.

Among a community-based sample of bilingual middle-aged Latinx adults, positive attitudes towards code-switching were associated with greater likelihood of code-switching in conversations, higher English proficiency, being US born, younger age, and English language dominance but negatively associated with visual working memory. These findings indicate that code-switching attitudes are influenced by sociodemographic and linguistic factors. Additionally, the negative association between code-switching attitudes and visual working memory provides support for previous studies showing code-switching as a disadvantage to cognition. Results of this study suggest that detailed characterization of sociocultural factors and aspects of bilingualism can provide further clarity in determining if there is a potential bilingual cognitive advantage. Future research should examine the relationship of code-switching with other aspects of bilingualism (e.g., age of acquisition).

The Boston Naming Test (BNT) is a 60-item confrontation naming task requiring participants to name a series of pictures. Prior research has shown that bilingual children have smaller vocabularies than monolinguals and that this effect continues into adulthood. Numerous studies have confirmed that bilingual adults name fewer pictures correctly than monolinguals on the BNT. Research also shows that self-reported workload correlates with neuropsychological test performance and that estimates of workload provide additional information regarding cognitive outcomes. Hardy and Wright (2018) conditionally validated a measure of perceived mental workload called the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX; Hart & Staveland 1988) with healthy adults on a neuropsychological test (i.e., the Tower of Hanoi). Research also shows that bilinguals report higher perceived workloads on cognitive tasks compared to monolinguals. Although this work has recently extended to other tests, to our knowledge, the workload profile of the BNT remains relatively unexplored. We evaluated BNT performance and perceived workload via the NASA-TLX in monolinguals and bilinguals. We predicted that monolinguals would outperform bilinguals on the BNT, but that bilinguals would report higher workloads.

The study sample consisted of 84 healthy participants (36 monolinguals, 48 bilinguals) with a mean age of 28.94 (SD = 10.76). Participants completed the standard 60-item BNT in English. The NASA-TLX scale was utilized to evaluate perceived workload across six subscales. The NASA-TLX was also completed in English after the completion of the BNT. ANOVAs were used to test BNT performance and perceived workload ratings between our language groups.

We found that monolinguals performed better on the BNT compared to bilinguals, p =.001, np2 = 24. However, bilinguals reported exerting more effort when completing the BNT compared to monolinguals, p =.002, np2 = .11. Additionally. bilinguals also experienced more frustration when completing the BNT compared to monolinguals, p =.034, np2 = .05.

As expected, results revealed that monolinguals outperformed bilingual participants on the BNT. However, bilinguals exerted more effort on the BNT and reported the BNT to be more frustrating. A possible reason for bilinguals underperforming and reporting higher perceived workloads on the BNT may be because correct responses were only accepted in English. This may have caused bilingual speakers to exert increased effort to complete the task in a non-native language. In turn, this increased effort likely increased cognitive load and led to higher frustration levels. Further research is needed to confirm our findings and support the idea that bilingualism leads to perceiving greater effort and frustration, and to determine whether there are subgroup differences in BNT performances among bilingual individuals (e.g., English learned as a first language compared to English learned as a second language).

A common neuropsychological task used is the Digit Span, known as a test of attention and working memory. The Digit Span Forward (DS-F) task evaluates attention; meanwhile, the Digit Span Backward (DS-B) and Sequencing (DS-S) evaluate working memory. Research shows that persons that speak multiple languages demonstrate better attention and working memory abilities compared to monolingual speakers. The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was conditionally validated by Hardy and Wright (2018) to measure perceived mental workload. Research also shows that bilinguals report higher perceived workloads on cognitive tasks compared to monolinguals. With that said, it was hypothesized that bilinguals would demonstrate better performances on Digit Span tasks compared to monolinguals. Additionally, it was hypothesized that bilinguals would report higher perceived workloads on all digit span tasks compared to monolinguals.

The sample consisted of 29 psychologically and neurologically healthy participants with a mean age of 29.66 (SD = 7.14). Participants were divided into two groups: English monolingual speakers (n = 10) and English and other language bilingual speakers (n = 19).

Participants completed all the subtests of the Digit Span (i.e., DS-F, DS-B, DS-S) in English. The NASA-TLX was used to measured DS-F, DS-B, and DS-S perceived workloads. The NASA-TLX was completed after each Digit Span subtest in English. We used ANOVAs to evaluate DS-F, DS-B, and DS-S performance and their perceived workload between our language groups.

We found no significant differences between language groups on the DS-F. However, the bilingual group reported the DS-F to be more temporally demanding and frustrating compared to the monolingual group, p’s < .05, nps2 =.14-.15. Next, we found that the monolingual group outperformed the bilingual group on the DS-B task, p = .027, np2 = .17. On the other hand, the bilingual group reported the DS-B task to be more temporally demanding and frustrating compared to the monolingual group, p’s < .05, nps2=.18-.20. Finally, on the DS-S task the monolingual group outperformed the bilingual group, p = .043, np2 = .14. Meanwhile, the bilingual group reported the DS-S task to be more mentally and temporally demanding compared to the monolingual group, p’s < .05, nps2=.18-.34.

Contrary to our hypothesis, results show that monolinguals outperformed bilinguals on DS-B and DS-S, but not DS-F. However, as expected, bilinguals did report higher perceived workloads (e.g., frustration) on Digit Span tasks compared to monolinguals. A possible explanation could be that bilinguals’ efforts to remember the numbers were more taxing compared to monolinguals’ because they had to inhibit from verbally responding in their other language. Rushing bilinguals to provide responses, ultimately developing higher perceived workloads on Digit Span tasks. Future work should investigate if time perspective may be influencing bilingual speakers Digit Span performances and perceived workloads.

Hispanics account for approximately 19% of the US population and are the second largest ethnic group in the United States, yet they remain underrepresented in neuropsychology research. Common recruitment barriers include language, fear/mistrust, and unfamiliarity with neuropsychology. These recruitment challenges then interfere with the development of measures normed on Spanish-speaking Hispanics. The research team for a Spanish-based neuropsychological study at a pediatric medical setting in North Texas utilized several methods to maximize recruitment of Hispanics and identify the most successful strategies. It was hypothesized that internal recruitment efforts would have the best outcome.

Recruitment of healthy Spanish-speaking children between 6.0 and 17.11 years old began in October 2021 and continues to date. Participants have been recruited within the Dallas Fort-Worth (DFW) metroplex using internal efforts within the pediatric medical center and external efforts in the community-at-large. Internal recruitment efforts have included: 1) setting up flyers at 19 different ambulatory clinics, 2) emailing study flyer to several internal groups, and 3) sharing information during a Hispanic workgroup meeting. Community-based efforts have included collaborating with: 1) a Spanishimmersion private elementary school (i.e., shared information with parents via email and sent flyers home with students), 2) three mental health colleagues (i.e., displayed study flyers within their clinic space and promoted study through word-of-mouth), 3) a local city council (i.e., featured flyer in electronic newsletter), and 4) a non-profit community organization (i.e., shared information and flyer through mass-text messages, social media post, and mass email to subscribers).

To date, 74 parent-child pairs have made one-time contact with the research team to inquire about the study and 55 have completed a second contact with initial screener by phone (19 lost to follow up). Of the screened families, 58% heard of the study through the non-profit organization, 31% through the Spanish-immersion private school, and 11% from internal recruitment efforts.

Although we hypothesized that internal -based recruitment within the medical institution would be most fruitful, our findings did not support this hypothesis. A possible explanation could be that children recruited from medical clinics may not meet criteria for participation in our study (i.e., healthy children). Another possible reason may be that flyer-based recruitment in a medical clinic is too passive or impersonal. Recruitment through community organizations with sources known and trusted by participants was found to be the most successful method to recruit potential participants. Considering these findings, our approach to recruitment will move away from passive and indirect methods of recruitment (i.e., flyers in clinics) and emphasize alliance with community-based organizations to promote trust building and collaborative relationships between researchers, community organizations, and Hispanic research participants.

The Latinx population is rapidly aging and growing in the US and is at increased risk for stroke and dementia. We examined whether bilingualism confers cognitive resilience following stroke in a community-based sample of Mexican American (MA) older adults.

Participants included predominantly urban, non-immigrant MAs aged 65+ from the Brain Attack Surveillance in Corpus Christi- Cognitive study. Participants were recruited using a two-stage area probability sample with door-to-door recruitment until the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic; sampling and recruitment were then completed via telephone. Cognition was assessed with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; 30-item in-person, 22-item via telephone) in English or Spanish. Bilingualism was assessed via a questionnaire and degree of bilingualism was calculated (range 0%-100% bilingual). Stroke history was collected via self-report. We harmonized the 22-item to the 30-item MoCA using published equipercentile equating. We conducted a series of regressions with the harmonized MoCA score as the dependent variable, stroke history and degree of bilingualism as independent variables, and age, sex/gender, education, assessment language, assessment mode (in-person vs. phone), and self-reported vascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, heart disease) as covariates. We included a stroke history by bilingualism interaction to examine whether bilingualism modifies the association between stroke history and MoCA performance.

Participants included 841 MA older adults (59% women; age M(SE) = 73.5(0.2); 44% less than high school education). Most (77%) of the sample completed the MoCA in English. 93 of 841 participants reported a history of stroke. In an unadjusted model, degree of bilingualism (b = 3.41, p < .0001) and stroke history (b = -1.98, p = .003) were associated with MoCA performance. In a fully adjusted model, stroke history (b = -1.79, p = .0007) but not bilingualism (b = 0.78, p = .21) was associated with MoCA performance. When an interaction term was added to the fully adjusted model, the interaction between stroke history and bilingualism was not significant (b= -0.47, p = .78).

Degree of bilingualism does not modify the association between stroke history and MoCA performance in Mexican American older adults. These results should be replicated in samples of validated strokes, more comprehensive bilingualism and cognitive assessments, and in other bilingual populations.

This longitudinal study investigates whether reading strategies are influenced by the orthographic depth of languages, specifically Spanish or Cantonese, acquired through enrollment in bilingual immersion programs. Spanish shares an alphabet with English and is considered a phonologically transparent language (Sun et al., 2022). Research has shown that second language learners of Cantonese, an opaque language, performed better on orthographic awareness tasks that involve whole-word visual information processing (Wang and Geva, 2003). We hypothesize that students enrolled in a bilingual immersion program will outperform peers in general education (GENED) on selected reading tasks. More specifically, those in Spanish-immersion programs will perform better on English tasks involving phonological processing; whereas those in Cantonese-immersion programs will perform better on single-word/character processing tasks.

Participants (n=102) were native English speakers recruited from the San Francisco Unified School District. Our sample included 42 females and 60 males. Thirty-nine identified as White, 33 Mixed Race, 25 Asian, 4 Latinx, and 1 Black. Thirty-nine children were in GENED, 33 in Spanish immersion programs (Sp), and 30 in Cantonese immersion programs (Cn). Each child was assessed on a core language/behavioral battery at Kindergarten (T1) and 2nd-3rd grade (T2). Time 2 participants were between 7 and 9 years old.

Those that scored at least one standard deviation below the mean (SS=85) on a nonverbal intelligence screener (KBIT-2 Matrices) were excluded to mitigate confounds of intellectual disabilities. Groups' performance in English was compared on English tasks involving phonological processing (CTOPP-2 Blending Words and Elision) and single-word/character information processing tasks (WJ-IV Letter Word Identification and KABC-II Rebus).

Simple main effects analysis showed that time did have a statistically significant effect on test performance (p <0.001). At T2, analysis revealed a significant impact of school enrollment on Blending Words [F (2, 51.0) = 4.19, p = 0.018]. As predicted, post-hoc analysis revealed the students enrolled in the Spanish-immersion program significantly outperformed those in general education on this task. Across the other three tasks, those enrolled in Spanish and Cantonese immersion programs performed as strong as or better than those in GENED, but the variability was not statistically significant.

This study uniquely isolated the effects of bilingual education without confounding factors of access to resources of a more heterogeneous socioeconomic sample. Mixed results partially supported our hypotheses: Spanish-immersion participants performed significantly better than those in GENED on one English phonological processing task (Blending Words). Although Cantonese immersion students had a higher mean performance than those in GENED on single-word/-character processing tasks, the variance was not statistically significant. This implies that bilingual education may offer advantages in either reading strategy. According to the literature, characteristics of a language may influence literacy acquisition; thus, subsequent research may continue to examine the effect of learning multiple languages with varying levels of orthographic depth on the development of English reading strategies.

The Cordoba Naming Test (CNT) is a 30-item confrontation naming task. The administration of the CNT can be administered in multiple languages. Hardy and Wright (2018) conditionally validated a measure of perceived mental workload called the National Aeronautic Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). They found that workload ratings on the NASA-TLX increased with increased demands on a cognitive task. Researchers found interactions in a study examining language proficiency and language (i.e., in which the test was administered) on several tasks of the Golden Stroop Test. Their results revealed that unbalanced bilinguals’ best-spoken language showed significantly better results compared to balanced bilinguals’ where language use did not matter. To our knowledge, no study has examined the order effects of Spanish-English bilingual speakers’ CNT performance and perceived workloads when completed in Spanish first compared to English second and vice-versa. We predicted that persons that completed the CNT in English first would demonstrate better performances and report lower perceived workloads on the CNT compared to completing the CNT in Spanish second. In addition, we predicted that persons that completed the CNT in Spanish first would demonstrate worse performance and higher perceived workloads on the CNT compared to completing the CNT in English second.

The sample consisted of 62 Spanish-English healthy and neurologically bilingual speakers with a mean age of 19.94 (SD= 3.36). Thirty-seven participants completed the CNT in English first and then in Spanish (English-to-Spanish) and 25 participants completed the CNT in Spanish first and then in English (Spanish-to-English). The NASA-TLX was used to evaluate CNT perceived workloads. All the participants completed the NASA-TLX in English and Spanish after completing the CNT in the language given, respectfully. A series of paired-samples T-Tests were completed to evaluate groups CNT performance and perceived workload.

We found that the English-to-Spanish group performed better on the CNT in English first than completing it in Spanish second, p = .000. We also found that the English-to-Spanish group reported better performance and less mentally demanding on the CNT when it was completed in English first compared to completing it in Spanish second, p’s < .05. Regarding the Spanish-to-English group, we found participants performed worse when they completed the CNT in Spanish first compared to completing the CNT in English second, p = .000. Finally, the Spanish-to-English group reported worse performance completing the CNT in Spanish first, more temporal demanding, and more frustrating compared to completing the CNT in English second, p’s < .05.

As expected, when participants completed the CNT in English, regardless of the order, they performed better and reported lower perceived workloads compared to completing the CNT in Spanish. Our data suggests that language order effect influenced participants CNT performance possibly due to not knowing specific items in Spanish compared to in English. Future studies using larger sample sizes should evaluate language order effects on the CNT in Spanish-English balanced bilingual speakers compared to unbalanced bilingual speakers.