Exposure therapy is consistently indicated as the first-line treatment for anxiety-related disorders. Unfortunately, therapists often deliver exposure therapy in an overly cautious, less effective manner, characterized by using their own ‘therapist safety behaviours’. Cognitive behavioural models postulate that beliefs about therapist safety behaviours are related to their use; however, little is known about the beliefs therapists hold regarding therapist safety behaviour use. The present study aimed to identify the beliefs exposure therapists have regarding the necessity of therapist safety behaviours and to examine the relationship between this construct and therapist safety behaviour use. Australian psychologists (n = 98) completed an online survey that included existing measures of therapist safety behaviour use, therapist negative beliefs about exposure therapy, likelihood to exclude anxious clients from exposure therapy, and use of intensifying exposure techniques. Participants also completed the Exposure Implementation Beliefs Scale (EIBS), a measure created for the present study which assesses beliefs regarding the necessity of therapist safety behaviours. Beliefs about the necessity of therapist safety behaviours – particularly in protecting the client – significantly predicted therapist safety behaviour use. Findings suggest that exposure therapy training media should aim to decrease therapist safety behaviour use by addressing beliefs about the necessity of therapist safety behaviours, especially in protecting the client.

Behavioural experiments (BEs) are a major cognitive ingredient in the cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) model which can be applied in-session or between-sessions. In-session BEs are particularly effective and widely demonstrated in anxiety disorders, yet they remain under-utilised in depression. Clients presenting with persistent depression are often difficult to engage due to the chronicity of their symptoms and their learnt self-perpetuating demoralised states. Research to date demonstrates the effectiveness of in-session BEs in engagement and treatment in depression. This case study details the treatment of a client presenting with persistent major depressive disorder (MDD) with hopelessness and how in-session BEs effected engagement and treatment. This case study is discussed with reference to strengths, limitations, clinical implications and recommendations for practice and development.

Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) including Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) is recommended by NICE as the psychological treatment of choice for obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD). Twenty-five percent of OCD patients refuse ERP, and many psychologists advocate formulation-driven cognitive therapy, including ERP, as opposed to ERP alone. However, a recent meta-analysis suggested there is insufficient evidence to suggest ERP is improved by cognitive methods. This paper proposes to contribute to this debate by providing a detailed description of the treatment of a patient with intrusive cognitions of a sexual nature, who was treated successfully using behavioural experiments designed to test cognitions, rather than ERP. This is, arguably, the way in which most cognitive behavioural therapists would work with someone with OCD. However, this approach is not reflected in the literature at present. The authors report the patient's feedback that therapeutic change was brought about through cognitive shift, as a result of the formulation-driven behavioural experiments.

Exposure therapy is a widely used and well-evidenced treatment for a variety of avoidance behaviours. This paper offers a modest proposal for an improvement in how it is carried out (‘dynamic hierarchies’). The theoretical and practical context is set out, including some thoughts on the role of appraisals and cognitive dissonance, and some advantages of the method are suggested.

Beliefs in the benefits of smoking are reported by most smokers. Such beliefs have been shown to be modifiable, and belief modification has been shown to predict smoking cessation (Petersen, Kinderman and Maguire, 1998). This study evaluates a treatment group conducted in an NHS Specialist Smoking Cessation Service which explicitly challenged beliefs about the benefits and pleasures of smoking. There were 152 participants. At 4 weeks post quit date, 110 participants had stopped smoking, (72.4%), 26 were still smoking, (17.1%) and 16 were lost to follow-up (10.5%). At the 52 week follow-up, 45 were still not smoking (29.6%), 54 were smoking (35.2%) and 53 were lost (34.9%). This compares favourably with other published data on smoking outcomes, which report quit rates ranging from 17–19% (NICE, 2002; Ferguson, Bauld, Chesterman and Judge, 2005.) Treatment was perceived positively by participants, most of whom who felt it had changed their attitudes to smoking, enhanced their motivation to quit, and increased their confidence in their ability to quit.