We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Andrea Bianchi, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva,Fuad Zarbiyev, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva
Authors are commonly thought to have a privileged position when it comes to the interpretation of their texts. Since treaties are consensual instruments, it is not surprising that the parties have a say in the interpretation of their treaties. At the same time, treaties cannot escape what is the fate of every text: the possibility to read a text in the absence of its author is structurally inscribed in it. This chapter examines the ways in which the parties can influence treaty interpretation in various phases of the life of the treaties. It also accounts for the diminishing state authority in the modern practice of treaty interpretation.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.