We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Unpredictable environmental conditions, crowd dynamics, and a variety of medical emergencies create logistical and clinical obstacles when planning emergency medical response coverage for mass-gathering events. In a collaborative endeavor between a university athletics program and an academic division of Emergency Medicine, a stadium emergency medical response system was created consisting of hospital-based healthcare providers and pre-hospital healthcare providers.
Objectives
Provide descriptive statistics relevant to the nature and frequency of injury/illness, location of treatment within stadium confines, and resources used in the care of students, event staff, and spectators during collegiate football operations, to assist in future planning of mass-gathering events.
Methods
A continuously updated, quality assurance database of de-identified, aggregate statistics was utilized to analyze trends regarding aspects of medical operations.
Results
During a 7-game home football season, there were a total of 399 patients encounters, including 1 cardiac arrest (0.25%), 12 “life-threatening” (3.01%), 121 urgent (30.33%), and 266 routine (66.67%). Total season attendance was 201,248 attendees (28,749/game and 19.83 patients encounters per 10,000 in attendance). Twenty-eight patients were transported (1.39 per 10,000), with eight resultant hospital admissions. Encounters varied by complaint, with skin (42%) comprising the largest number of encounters. Other categories included: (1) heat-related (23.5%); (2) allergic (15%); (3) neurologic (10.3%); (4) cardiopulmonary (3.5%); (5) gastrointestinal (3.6%); (6) musculoskeletal (5%); and (7) other (5%). Encounters increased noticeably when the heat index was greater than 80 °F– (29.4 vs. 10.5 per 10,000 attendees).
Conclusions
The collaborative effort by a multi-level provider model adequately covered presenting medical conditions. Consistent with previously literature, a strong correlation existed between heat index and number of patient encounters deemed urgent and routine. Interestingly, the number of “life-threatening” encounters did not appear to vary much with the heat index. Further studies of medical presentations and provider/resource utilization could provide for predictive modeling of future staffing and supply models.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.