Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • Chapter 2 - Inferential Knowledge from Falsehood

  • Federico Luzzi, University of Aberdeen
  • Book:
    Knowledge from Non-Knowledge
    Published online:
    26 July 2019
    Print publication:
    01 August 2019, pp 8-31

  • Summary

    This chapter concerns the current debate on inferential knowledge from falsehood. After presenting Warfield's influential cases of inferential knowledge from false belief, I respond to an explicit challenge raised by Montminy to Warfield's cases. I then rebut further attacks on Warfield's cases raised by Schnee, and outline some significant costs that those critical of Warfield's cases must shoulder.

Knowledge from Non-Knowledge
  • Inference, Testimony and Memory
  • Federico Luzzi
  • Published online:
    26 July 2019
    Print publication:
    01 August 2019
  • According to the received view in epistemology, inferential knowledge from non-knowledge is impossible - that is, in order for a subject to know the conclusion of their inference, they must know the essential premises from which that conclusion is drawn. In this book, Federico Luzzi critically examines this view, arguing that it is less plausible than intuition suggests and that it can be abandoned without substantial cost. In a discussion that ranges across inference, testimony and memory he analyses the full range of challenges to the view, connecting them to epistemological cases that support those challenges. He then proposes a defeater-based framework which allows the phenomenon of knowledge from non-knowledge across these three epistemic areas to be better understood. His book will be of interest to a wide range of readers in epistemology.