Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 33 - The Ordering of Knowledge in Four Late Patristic Christological Handbooks

  • Edited by Lewis Ayres, University of Durham and Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Michael W. Champion, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Matthew R. Crawford, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne
  • Book:
    The Intellectual World of Late Antique Christianity
    Published online:
    05 October 2023
    Print publication:
    26 October 2023, pp 626-643

  • Summary

    This chapter discusses how knowledge is ordered in four theological treatises dating to the late sixth and early seventh centuries, the last phase of late Roman civilisation: Pamphilus’ Capita diversa, Leontius of Jerusalem’s Contra Monophysitas, Theodore of Raithou’s Praeparatio and De sectis, a transcript of lectures given by a monk called Theodore. These texts, which were written in Palestine and Egypt, defend the interpretation of the incarnation of the divine Word that had been given by the Council of Chalcedon against the attacks of opponents, in particular the Monophysites. They are not original contributions to the christological discourse but present material taken from earlier texts in such a way that it can be used in debates about doctrine.