Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • 9 - Nonreligiosity and the Republicans

  • David E. Campbell, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, Geoffrey C. Layman, University of Notre Dame, Indiana, John C. Green, University of Akron, Ohio
  • Book:
    Secular Surge
    Published online:
    14 January 2021
    Print publication:
    03 December 2020, pp 166-180

  • Summary

    Shows that although Secularists are concentrated in Democratic ranks, secularism and nonreligiosity both matter within the GOP as well. Among Republicans, there is a small but vocal group of Secularist libertarians. Like the Secularists on the political left, they have sharply defined ideological views. Even larger is the number of Non-Religionists who found favor with Donald Trump – less consistently ideological, perhaps, but no less passionate.

  • 29 - Can You See the Indian?

  • from Part IV - Visions and Revisions: 21st-Century Prospects
  • Edited by Melanie Benson Taylor, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
  • Book:
    The Cambridge History of Native American Literature
    Published online:
    18 September 2020
    Print publication:
    17 September 2020, pp 526-530

  • Summary

    The chapter argues strategic essentialism has become the prevailing mode of thinking among scholars in Native American discourse, and traces its development over the past few decades. I suggest this has produced a host of unintended consequences and is, generally speaking, a bad thing. Mainly because the scholars are reflecting and advancing ideas held by many Native Americans in the United States, not just those in the academy. I analyze this condition through a discussion of the HBO series “The Leftovers,” recent exhibitions at the National Museum of the American Indian, and the rise of the tea party movement in 2014.