We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 11, “Deeper Structures of Song Governance,” argues that the perennial task of imperial governance was to forge a functional union of the state’s inner and outer capacities by converging the technocratic and literati foci of governance. There were two models for achieving this goal. The institutionalist model, favored by committed Confucians because it depended on a fixed system of hierarchically ordered agencies administered by the civil bureaucracy, was administratively complex, difficult to maintain, and inherently unstable. The other alternative was an informal alliance between a powerful, often the sole, chief councilor, acting as imperial surrogate, and the senior empress, as de facto leaders respectively of the outer and inner courts. This union, by bridging the inner/outer divide, harnessed the full range of inner/outer state capacity and enabled the creation of fluid, ad hoc agencies that could span this divide to achieve specific, targeted administrative tasks. The four great autocrats of Southern Song – Qin Gui 秦檜 (1090–1155), Han Tuozhou 韓侂冑 (1152–1207), Shi Miyuan 史彌遠 (1164–1233), and Jia Sidao 賈似道 (1213–1275) – all fit this pattern. This chapter concludes with some suggestions for how this technocratic–Confucian continuum model of the deeper structure of Song governance may apply to other dynasties during the Chinese imperial period.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.