Medical Reserve Corps’ volunteers underwent stop-the-bleed, triage, and disaster preparedness training to improve victim survival of a mass casualty event.

Volunteer responses to 16 disaster vignettes were recorded as ‘survived’ if correct, or ‘died’ if incorrect. Volunteers’ characteristics were evaluated based on the health outcomes of the vignette victims via logistic regression.

Overall, 69 volunteers evaluated 1104 vignette victims. STB training significantly improved survival from 77.2% to 93.2% (P < 0.001). The training did not improve disaster preparedness (75.5% to 73%) nor triage (33.5% to 35.1%). Volunteer first care provider training in psychological first aid improved victim survival from 10.32 (9.6 - 10.9, 95% CI) to 11.9 (11.28 - 12.5, 95% CI). The odds of survival increased when disaster victims received first care from a volunteer who had a positive perception of the public authority’s truthfulness (1.50, range 1.07 - 2.10); stated a willingness to volunteer (1.65, range 1.2 - 2.26); completed psychological first aid training (1.557, range 1.08 - 2.22); or had 4-or-more years of post-secondary education (1.30, range 1.00 - 1.701).

Psychological first aid training should be a basic requirement for disaster volunteers. Trust in public authority to provide protective public health recommendations increases disaster survival.

The objective of this study was to determine providers' opinions of SALT Triage after receiving training and using it during a simulated mass-casualty incident.

A survey was conducted of trainees in a disaster course. Trainees were given a-30 minute lecture on SALT (sort, assess, life-saving interventions, treatment and/or transport) Triage and then used it during a drill. After the drill, trainees were asked to complete the survey. Results were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Thirty trainees (11 medical doctors (MDs), six registered nurses (RNs), eight emergency medical technicians (EMTs), one RN/EMTs, four other) participated in the course. Of these participants, 67% had prior drill experience (mean: 10 drills) and 37% had prior mass-casualty incident experience (mean: four experiences). Prior to the drill: 7% reported that they felt very confident using SALT Triage, 33% were confident, 30% were somewhat confident, and 30% were not confident. After the drill: none reported not feeling confident using SALT Triage, 27% were at the same level of confidence, 73% felt more confident, and none felt less confident. Before the drill: 52% of respondents felt SALT Triage was easier to use than their current disaster triage protocol, 44% felt it was similar, and 4% felt it was more difficult. After the drill: 67% did not change how easy they felt SALT Triage was to use, 26% thought it was easier to use, and 3% thought it was similar.

Providers felt confident using SALT triage after a 30-minute training session and found it was similar or easier to use than their current triage protocol. Using SALT Triage during a drill improved confidence.