Children and young people from refugee backgrounds witness and experience multiple traumatic incidents in the context of their refugee journeys that often remain unspoken because of the inherent challenge to think and talk about these experiences. In addition, they encounter ongoing trials when transitioning to their new homes which place them at risk. Jungle Tracks was developed in 2002 to facilitate therapeutic engagement with refugee children and young people in schools, within a preventative framework. It is a collection of five short stories that have been composed to mirror multiple traumas and cumulative struggles including grief and loss, displacement, discrimination, disempowerment, difficulties with sleep and affect regulation. Whilst communicating in a non-threatening manner, the stories encourage the reader/listener to connect and make meaning of their traumas by identifying with the protagonists in the stories. Jungle Tracks not only bypasses initial resistance but also leverages the power of stories to instil hope and unleash innate healing forces. This paper aims to provide an overview of the Jungle Tracks programme and the results of an initial evaluation of the implementation of Jungle Tracks. This was initiated to provide direction for future research and development of the programme. It was concluded that when children and young people are given the opportunity to process and make meaning of their past traumatic experiences, it can assist them to heal and recover and also offer them the potential for post traumatic growth.

This study explores the mental health difficulties associated with severe trauma as experienced by refugees and asylum seekers, and issues related to psychological treatments. An evaluation was conducted of a culturally adapted cognitive therapy group programme for Tamil refugees and asylum seekers in the Wandsworth IAPT (Improving Access to Psychological Therapies) service. Data were examined from 16 Tamil participants who accessed the service between 2014 and 2015 and subsequently engaged in the group programme between 2015 and 2016. The IAPT minimum data set (PHQ9, GAD-7, Phobia scale and WSAS) and IES-R (Impact of Events Scale Revised) were used as quantitative measures. Qualitative feedback about the programme was also obtained. A positive change in the wellbeing of participants was indicated by a reduction in the severity of negative symptoms for all metrics and qualitative feedback provided additional evidence that participants had benefited from the programme. The implications of these findings are discussed.