Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • Chapter 19 - Collective Biographies and African American History

  • from Part VI - Case Studies
  • Edited by John Ernest, University of Delaware
  • Book:
    Race in American Literature and Culture
    Published online:
    26 May 2022
    Print publication:
    16 June 2022, pp 309-323

  • Summary

    Collective biographies have played a major role in African American historical writing since the early nineteenth century. The essay explores two of the many African American collective biographies published in the last decades of the century: Men of Mark (1887) and Progress of a Race (1897). Produced during what Rayford Logan has called the “nadir” of race relations, they aimed at showcasing the achievements of African Americans and inspiring pride and emulation in black audiences. Their authors also vigorously denounced the current degraded situation of African Americans. Unlike Men of Mark, which clearly targeted a black readership, Progress of a Race, signed by two authors, one black, one white, attempted to reach a double audience of blacks and whites. The second part of the essay looks into the publishing history of the works, both of which were issued by white subscription houses, and examines the way they were promoted, marketed, and received. It raises intriguing questions as to the marketability and audience of works primarily aimed at an African American readership.