The early clinical predictors of respiratory failure in Latin Americans with Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) have scarcely been studied. This is of particular importance since Latin America has a high frequency of axonal GBS variants that may imply a worse prognosis.

We studied 86 Mexican patients with GBS admitted to the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, a referral center of Mexico City, to describe predictors of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).

The median age was 40 years (interquartile range: 26–53.5), with 60.5% men (male-to-female ratio: 1.53). Most patients (65%) had an infectious antecedent (40.6% gastrointestinal). At admission, 38% of patients had a Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score <30. Axonal subtypes predominated (60.5%), with acute motor axonal neuropathy being the most prevalent (34.9%), followed by acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (32.6%), acute motor sensory axonal neuropathy (AMSAN) (25.6%), and Fisher syndrome (7%). Notably, 15.1% had onset in upper limbs, 75.6% dysautonomia, and 73.3% pain. In all, 86% received either IVIg (9.3%) or plasma exchange (74.4%). IMV was required in 39.5% patients (72.7% in AMSAN). A multivariate model without including published prognostic scores yielded the time since onset to admission <15 days, axonal variants, MRC sum score <30, and bulbar weakness as independent predictors of IMV. The model including grading scales yielded lower limbs onset, Erasmus GBS respiratory insufficiency score (EGRIS) >4, and dysautonomia as predictors.

These results suggest that EGRIS is a good prognosticator of IMV in GBS patients with a predominance of axonal electrophysiological subtypes, but other early clinical data should also be considered.

The response of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) to intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIgs) treatment is well established. However, it remains unclear whether patients not responding to two IVIg treatments or those whose condition stabilizes (ICE trial) may benefit from additional doses. We aim to identify the time period required to reach maximal strength gains from IVIg treatment.

Retrospective chart review of 14 patients with CIDP was performed. Change in handgrip (HG), Knee extension (KE), elbow flexion, and dorsiflexion was analyzed with a dynamometer during IVIg therapy. Strength improvements in Nm or kg, cumulative grams (g) of IVIg, and time in days required for maximal strength recovery were determined per function (± standard error of the mean). Ancillary therapy was recorded for all patients.

Improvements in strength of each function were significant (p < 0.05). Earliest improvement was in HG (137.07 ± 21.23) and latest in KE (238.15 ± 38.9). Majority of patients improved by 200 days of therapy. HG required the lowest cumulative grams of IgG (561.71 ± 97.21) and KE the most (798 ± 120.7).

Our study has demonstrated the effectiveness of multiple treatments with IVIg to reach significant improvement in strength. Different muscle groups manifested different time dependency, reflecting the requirement of variable amounts of IVIg. Improvement was identified on an ongoing basis, with therapy lasting between 20.2 and 37.3 weeks, requiring between 562 and 798 g of IVIg.