Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 4 - Justices of the Peace at Accusatory Theatres

  • George Pavlich, University of Alberta
  • Book:
    Thresholds of Accusation
    Published online:
    14 September 2023
    Print publication:
    28 September 2023, pp 88-114

  • Summary

    More directly focused on the internal scripts for performances at these theatres, the fourth Chapter describes how colonial criminal accusation worked through arrayed chambers; laying information, arrest, and summary trials or preliminary examination. It highlights the pretrial work of oft-overlooked leading actors in law enforcement – senior police officers serving ex officio as justices of the peace. Descending from age-old British legal institutions, the colonial justice of the peace migrated to eastern Canada and then to pretrial arenas in the North-West Territories. By way of paradigmatic examples, the chapter shows how police and justices arranged – relying on legal scripts – theatres where performances of criminal accusation could be staged. The examples suggest that without accusatory theatres, colonial criminalization could not have appeared let alone presented itself as superior to other legal fields. Accusatory foundations were thus performatively implicated at the heart of colonial law’s attempts to manage dispossessing settler orders via criminalization.