Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • 8 - Establishing Baseline Privacy and Security Frameworks

  • from Part III - Concrete Legal Solutions for a Commercial Law of Privacy and Security
  • Stacy-Ann Elvy, University of California, Davis
  • Book:
    A Commercial Law of Privacy and Security for the Internet of Things
    Published online:
    17 August 2021
    Print publication:
    29 July 2021, pp 269-309

  • Summary

    In 2015, the US Senate passed a resolution recommending the adoption of a national strategy for IoT development (IoT Resolution).1 Currently, the proposed Developing Innovation and Growing the Internet of Things Act (DIGIT) would establish a federal working group and a steering committee within the Department of Commerce.2 If the act is adopted, the working group, under the guidance of the steering committee, would be charged with evaluating and providing a report containing recommendations to Congress on multiple IoT aspects.3 These areas include identifying federal statutes and regulations that could inhibit IoT growth and impact consumer privacy and security.4

  • 5 - All or nothing

  • Edited by Don E. Scheid, Winona State University, Minnesota
  • Book:
    The Ethics of Armed Humanitarian Intervention
    Published online:
    05 June 2014
    Print publication:
    24 April 2014, pp 78-94

  • Summary

    An increasingly common view among political philosophers is that, in fact, all justified humanitarian intervention is obligatory. There is no such thing as merely permissible: either there is a duty to intervene, or there is a duty not to intervene. This chapter considers the possibility those humanitarian interventions, which are permissible but discretionary for citizens, are always either obligatory or prohibited for their government, depending on the circumstances. Severe deprivations and human-rights abuses are a permanent feature of the world in which we live. There is a second feature of positive duties that makes the all-or-nothing view untenable as a description of the moral requirements of citizens. Namely, all positive duties are subject to a high-cost qualification. The all-or-nothing view, if taken as an account of the moral requirements of citizens, looks to be untenable.