This paper explores the application of ERM-style techniques to pension funds. It uses the term ‘entity-wide risk management’ rather than ‘enterprise risk management’, even though both have the same acronym (‘ERM’), because many pension funds do not view themselves as business ‘enterprises’ as such. Some of the techniques that business enterprises have for managing risk (e.g. raising new capital from shareholders or branching into new business areas if existing ones have unattractive risk-reward characteristics) may not be open to many pension funds. The paper argues that the holistic approach to risk management (and governance) that is a hallmark of ERM is as appropriate to pension funds as it is to any other type of entity. This is the case whether the fund is defined benefit or defined contribution in nature, or a hybrid. It is also the case whether the ‘entity’ is deemed to be the fund itself, the sponsor or the two combined. Indeed, there are aspects of pension arrangements, such as the relationship between the fund and its sponsor, that lend added impetus to the use of ERM-style techniques in practical pension fund management.

Using the stochastic investment model proposed by Wilkie (1995) this paper simulates the progress of a specimen final salary pension scheme over a period of 25 years. Salary experience over the projection period is also assumed to be stochastic. The specimen scheme is assumed to be stable during the projection period with respect to age, pensionable salary in real terms and past pensionable service.

Regular deterministic valuations of the scheme are conducted during the projection period to determine the current level of funding of the scheme on both a discontinuance and an ongoing basis, and also to determine the future contribution rate required to meet the funding objective. The required contribution rate is calculated in accordance with the Inland Revenue surplus regulations and the Minimum Funding Requirement (MFR) introduced in the Pensions Act 1995.

The effect on the level of funding (and, hence, on the size of the required contribution rate) of using different investment strategies and of varying the pace of funding, by adopting both a traditional prudent valuation basis and a more realistic valuation basis, are also explored.