Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • 3 - A Tale of Two Countries: Fundamental Rights in the “War on Terror”

  • from Part I - The National Security State in Perspective
  • Edited by Karen J. Greenberg, Fordham University, New York
  • Book:
    Reimagining the National Security State
    Published online:
    25 October 2019
    Print publication:
    07 November 2019, pp 21-34

  • Summary

    While many scholars and experts posit a like-mindedness between the US and the UK when it comes to national security policy, Douglass Cassel argues that the differences outweigh the similarities and that the UK model, while it overreaches in some respects, notably surveillance policies, is more “civilized, or liberal,” than in the United States. Cassel addresses the causes of these differences as well as the ways in which the relationship between the UK and US intelligence agencies exploits these differences.