Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 7 - Multilateral Reform of Investor–State Dispute Resolution Mechanism

  • from Part III - China, BRI and Investment Dispute Resolution
  • Edited by Wenhua Shan, Xian Jiaotong University, China, Sheng Zhang, Xian Jiaotong University, China, Jinyuan Su
  • Book:
    China and International Dispute Resolution in the Context of the ‘Belt and Road Initiative’
    Published online:
    03 March 2021
    Print publication:
    18 February 2021, pp 149-184

  • Summary

    It looks at the reform of investor–state dispute settlement from the perspective of fast resolution, party autonomy and cost management. It proposes a Chinese perspective on Multilateral Investment Dispute Resolution (MIDR) system of balance between public legitimacy management and private efficiency refinement. The institutional structure of MIDR should be of internal balance, moderating three tensions between state and arbitrator, between investor and host state, and between state and arbitral tribunal during ex ante and ex post process of dispute resolution. The process of establishment of MIDR should be of external balance, moderating tensions between procedure and substance of MIDR, between MIDR and existing institutions, and between legal rights of MIDR stakeholders and political will of leading states.