Sergei Kibalnik explores how Chekhov conducted polemics with major French writers of the nineteenth century and how he overcame his status as the “Russian Maupassant,” ultimately rejecting the latter’s absurd view of life in favor of a more homegrown redemptive moral strategy grounded in the possibility of inward transformation.

Flynn’s chapter argues for the crucial role of nineteenth-century French naturalism in the conception and evolution of Joyce’s Dubliners. Specifically, it argues that Joyce’s ambition to correct the development of his country through representing the debilitation of its capital city is modelled on Émile Zola’s aim in his naturalist, twenty-novel series Le Rougon-Macquart (1871-1893) to present and diagnose the pathologies of the Third Republic through representing several generations of a diseased family. However, in their indirection, Joyce’s stories expand upon an ambiguity intrinsic to naturalism – the subjectivity inherent in any would-be objective perception of reality – an ambiguity developed to comic effect by the second-generation naturalist, Guy de Maupassant in the story “Auprès d’un Mort” (Beside Schopenhauer’s Corpse). The chapter argues that the first story of Dubliners, “The Sisters,” is inspired by this minutely observed, disenchanted, and enigmatic story. The chapter closes by looking at the final scene of “The Dead” to argue that Joyce turns the dead end of naturalism into a test for an Irish readership.

This chapter focuses initially on the impact of late nineteenth-century medical theory (hysteria, hypnotism, etc.) on the novel and the burgeoning of medically-inflected fiction. Post-hypnotic suggestion led to stories of crime and sexual manipulation and introduced the figure of the unscrupulous doctor/hypnotist, usually bested by a good-hearted physician expert in hypnotism techniques. Ambient medical research on mind-control and dual identity influenced Maupassant’s fiction, most notably in his story ‘Le Horla’. Substantial tales (‘Boule de suif’, ‘La Maison Tellier’) foreshadow and feed the drama, irony and humour of Maupassant’s novels. Three of these are studied here: the raucous, ferociously ironic Bel-Ami, the family drama of illegitimacy and identity, Pierre et Jean, and a story of the despondency of ageing and lost love, Fort comme la mort. The chapter closes with a discussion of the novels of Rachilde (Marguerite Eymery), seen increasingly as an important figure of France’s decadent period. Her early novels Monsieur Vénus and La Marquise de Sade played daringly with the notion of gender reversals and sadism, exercised against men; such themes suggest today an underlying feminist persuasion, an affiliation she denied. Later novels, many-textured such as La Tour d’amour, or La Jongleuse, a male/female confrontation on seduction and love, reveal the broadening of the novelist’s talent.