We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected]
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
We consider the problem of approximating a probability measure defined on a metric space
by a measure supported on a finite number of points. More specifically we seek the
asymptotic behavior of the minimal Wasserstein distance to an approximation when the
number of points goes to infinity. The main result gives an equivalent when the space is a
Riemannian manifold and the approximated measure is absolutely continuous and compactly
supported.
Given the probability measure ν over the given region$\Omega\subset \mathbb{R}^n$, we consider the optimal location of a setΣ composed by n points in Ω in order to minimize theaverage distance $\Sigma\mapsto \int_\Omega \mathrm{dist}\,(x,\Sigma)\,{\rm d}\nu$ (theclassical optimal facility location problem). The paper compares twostrategies to find optimal configurations: the long-term one whichconsists in placing all n points at once in an optimal position, and the short-term one which consists in placing the points one by one addingat each step at most one point and preserving the configurationbuilt at previous steps. We show that the respective optimizationproblems exhibit qualitatively different asymptotic behavior as $n\to\infty$, although the optimization costs in both cases have the same asymptotic orders of vanishing.
where Xi, 1 ≦ i ≦ n, are i.i.d. and uniformly distributed in [0, 1]2. It is proved that Mn ∽ cn1–p/2 a.s. for 1 ≦ p <2. This result is motivated by recent developments in the theory of algorithms and the theory of subadditive processes as well as by a well-known problem of H. Steinhaus.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.