Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 11 - The Triad Training Model in Counseling, Cultural Diversity, and Intercultural Training

  • from Part II - Practice of Intercultural Training
  • Edited by Dan Landis, University of Hawaii, Hilo, Dharm P. S. Bhawuk, University of Hawaii, Manoa
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Intercultural Training
    Published online:
    18 September 2020
    Print publication:
    27 August 2020, pp 377-406

  • Summary

    This chapter describes Paul Pedersen’s Triad Training Model, which is a unique experiential activity originally designed for counselors-in-training to help them better understand culturally different others. While it is a versatile tool that can be effective in other types of training situations, it is not well-known outside the field of multicultural counseling. While many popular intercultural simulations target cultural awareness, the Triad Training model is more holistic in that it is able to simultaneously raise awareness, impart cultural knowledge, address emotional issues, and help participants develop skills. This chapter begins by explaining the cultural context that gave birth to the model as well as its research foundation in psychology. Next, it examines its goals as well as how it evolved during the forty years since its creation. Finally, because the model is confrontational in its approach, the author shows how she adapted it for collectivist cultures.