Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

3 results

  • 29 - Convivialism, Interdependence, and Education

  • from Part III - Emerging Ethical Pathways and Frameworks
  • Edited by Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Ball State University, Indiana, Jessica Heybach, Florida International University, Dini Metro-Roland, Western Michigan University
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Ethics and Education
    Published online:
    07 March 2024
    Print publication:
    14 March 2024, pp 619-637

  • Summary

    This chapter presents convivialism as a conception of the good life to inform and reshape education. Drawing from Ivan Illich’s views of a convivial society and two more recent manifestos proposing convivialism as a political philosophy for a world in crisis, the chapter discusses how convivialism offers a conception of the good life focused on living with human and nonhuman others. Convivial education relies on a conception of knowledge and skills as tools for conviviality, as well as an appreciation for the necessity to limit what can be considered legitimate individual and collective desires. Finally, the chapter argues that convivialism can inspire new educational initiatives and support existing countermovements based on principles of degrowth and decolonization.

  • Slow Archaeology, Punk Archaeology, and the ‘Archaeology of Care’

  • William Caraher
  • Journal:
    European Journal of Archaeology / Volume 22 / Issue 3 / August 2019
    Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    05 April 2019, pp. 372-385
    Print publication:
    August 2019

  • This article considers the impact of both historical and digital transhuman practices in archaeology with an eye towards recent conversations concerning punk archaeology, slow archaeology, and an ‘archaeology of care’. Drawing on Ivan Illich, Jacques Ellul, and Gilles Deleuze, the article suggests that current trends in digital practices risk alienating archaeological labour and de-territorializing archaeological work.